you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 136 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Team expects, may be useful, could be used, prototype, are currently investigating and so on. Cool piece of technolgy, but no even mention when they'd expect that to be commercially available, if it's even possible to manufacture in commercial scale. Like many other new battery chemistries and technologies, it shows promise and makes a good headline, but at this point that's pretty much it.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago

    To be fair, commercial long-life nickel-iron batteries are already being sold for grid storage. The main reason they aren't used more widely is they cost more up front.

    That's ok, because they still cost less than alternatives over the full life span of the battery.

    The risk is that the higher purchase cost required will likely be wasted as new battery tech surpasses it long before its life is over.

    So for now, it's all about weighing opportunity cost, tech lock-in, and early obsolescence

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Well tbf this was a university lab which isn't focused on commercial production but just trying to prove their experiments

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    They are likely working under grants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    This is regular scientific hedging.

    This thing, even if it turns out to be real good, it's years away from being a marketable product. And it's alright! It says more about sensationalism in scientific communication.

  • source
  • parent