you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 18 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Wait, for personal ownership? It's always read to me more as an argument for gun control. Like, "the founding fathers obviously never intended for Joe Shmoe to have serious military hardware, not even in their day, so we should be banning automatic rifles and the like."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    And yet, there's not a single automatic in the story, while his oldy-timey weaponry shreds the invaders (the ruffians are probably ICE judging by recent events). A better argument for grapeshot, forsooth.

    And panties, at a minimum. Maybe add striped thigh-highs for maximum intimidation

  • source
  • parent