169
Why is Debian always left out of the distro recommendations? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I distro hopped for a bit before finally settling in Debian (because Debian was always mentioned as a distro good for servers, or stable machines that are ok with outdated software)

And while I get that Debian does have software that isn't as up to date, I've never felt that the software was that outdated. Before landing on Debian, I always ran into small hiccups that caused me issues as a new Linux user - but when I finally switched over to Debian, everything just worked! Especially now with Debian 13.

So my question is: why does Debian always get dismissed as inferior for everyday drivers, and instead mint, Ubuntu, or even Zorin get recommended? Is there something I am missing, or does it really just come down to people not wanting software that isn't "cutting edge" release?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 113 points 9 months ago (7 children)

For reasons similar to why plain bread doesn't show up in sandwich recommendations.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    That's my take too... it's certainly a soild choice, but not incredibly exciting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    boring is awesome if you need to just work all the time and for a long time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    agreed, Debian's rock solid for 99.99% of people.

    You just have to also accept the fact that if you’re doing something niche like VR gaming or using weird third-party custom hardware or something Debian sucks ass.

    i've worked on predominantly debian based infrastructure professionally for multimedia companies in the last 10ish years, so it's a little bit funny to me that og flavored debian doesn't do this, but it clearly can if you can afford an army of developers to create it for you.

    entire multi-billion dollar revenue streams literally exist because of debian doing this and doing it well, but everyone popularly and unquestioningly believe that you can't do it on linux. lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    That's why I recommend it for non-technical users that just need something to browse the web, Debian will not disappoint them.

    Also, GNOME is good for that. Many believe it has to look like Windows for less technical people, but people nowadays mostly are more used to Android than Windows, so having overview of open apps, a menu with shutdown and brightness and volume and sort of an app launcher seems quite natural to them.

    Recently installed it for people that have never used Linux before and they immediately got it. One of the two struggles with writing emails and attaching files and things like that, but GNOME is simple for them.

    Often simple solutions are the best, flashy solutions break and don't give the stability that's expected.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent