You realise the article itself suggests that the answer to the question is in fact "no", right? (That is to say, it agrees with Betteridges's law.)

And that carbon capture is often pushed by the oil industry as a magic bullet?

And that we often get headlines that look an awful lot like this that are trying to push an agenda which says "Yes, it's fine, big oil has everything under control. No need for any climate action," right?

I'm not sure why you're being a jackass towards people who you likely agree with.