you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I've seen some incredibly stupid takes on linked in about elementary CS knowledge like "use functions ! do you know what functions are?" so I'm not surprised looking at this image that

  1. the poster clearly did not proof read it. maybe he doesn't know how to read ?

  2. the poster did not see that the examples are nonsense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    You gotta be freaking insane to post this generated image IMO. Like how do you generate an image about something you know nothing about, and you aren't afraid that something that's used to generate images can generate something insightful regarding programming? And he doesn't proof read it, and if he did, didn't think twice admit the fact that the text isn't even saying any words at a few places.

    Like, he must not know anything about anything. 😐

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    you jest, but using the actual function keyword had to be made a point in my team's code style ruleset because people kept using the
    const somethingFunction = ( input ) => { return input*2; };
    syntax everywhere. (as opposed to:
    function somethingFunction ( input ) { return input*2; })

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment