glitchdx comments on Fans slam The Alters after discovering evidence of undisclosed gen AI in images, text, and translation

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

What am I projecting???

This is what using ChatGPT does yo your brain, it destroys your reading comprehension

Why is it that now that I am asking you to explain things, you won’t?

You’re projecting, and being an asshole

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

I'm willing to grant literally all of this. I have a deep-seated hatred of generative AI that clouds my ability to have productive discussions about it. It turns me into an asshole, specifically to people who defend it.

When did I demand an equivalence? That's what I asked 37 minutes ago, and what you've spent several replies now pivoting away from answering

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Since you're being reasonable again, I'll answer.

Perhaps "demanded" was the wrong word to use. It got the wrong point across. You did not explicitly ask for it, but rather strongly implied that you wanted the other guy's argument to be a certain way. (your comment I am referring to is quoted below). Ultimately, you were right, as the plot has thickened over the past 2 hours. In another comment the other guy agreed with the explanation I provided, and used that to claim that proc gen and gen ai are effectively the same (a claim that I disputed in another another comment). So on this point, you win. It was I who misunderstood the other guy's argument.

I feel like it does. theunknownmuncher thinks it’s somehow inconsistent to be against generative AI while being ok with procedural generation, which implies that they think they’re equivalent in some way. As if the reason people don’t like generative AI is because it makes bad games.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent