you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children)

The monopoly ruling that you are referring to IS focused exclusively on search engines.

Excellent, let's review an incomprehensive list of competing search engines:

  • Brave
  • Bing
  • DuckDuckGo (previously mentioned and you ignored)
  • Yandex
  • Kagi
  • Yahoo
  • Baidu
  • Ecosia
  • Qwant
  • AOL

In short, Google has WAY more competition in the search engine industry than Steam has in the PC game purchase industry. So maybe learn WTF you're talking about before being a dick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Jesus dude, you should really stick to things you know literally ANYTHING about. Half the search engines you listed are literally using the same engine. I guess Google should have hired you as their attorney.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
    1. It doesn't matter. They're still competition. Google does not make any money if you use DDG.
    2. And what about the other half?

    Are you actually going to engage with the point or continue lobbing personal insults and deflecting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You still haven't explained how the existence of Apple and Firefox mean Google should have prevailed in the lawsuit. Why don't we start there or are you just interested in dancing around how ignorant you are?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments