621
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues banning Twitter over its ability to AI-generate pornographic images of minors is just 'gatekeepers' attempting to 'censor all of their political opponents' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/games@sh.itjust.works
213 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 9 months ago (15 children)

It is sexual abuse even by your definition if photos of real children get sexualised by AI and land on xitter. And afaik know that is what's happened. These kids did not consent to have their likeness sexualised.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [+] -10 points 9 months ago* (14 children)

    Nothing done to your likeness is a thing that happened to you.

    Do you people not understand reality is different from fiction?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    My likeness posted for the world to see in a way i did not consent to is a thing done to me

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Your likeness depicted on the moon does not mean you went to the moon.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

    Your likebess modified naked being fucked, printed out and stapled to a tree in your neighborhood is ok then?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    A threat of murder is a crime without being the same thing as murder.

    Meditate on this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    And abuse is a different word than rape. Maybe meditate on that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    And what if neither happened?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Dude, you're just wrong. There seems to be a huge disconnect with you between what the law is. And what you want the law to be.

    You are not allowed to take an image of someone, photoshop them naked, and distributed it. Period.

    You are also not allowed to depict child sexual abuse. It doesn't matter if it's not real. It's the depiction of CSA taking place that is illegal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Depictions could somehow be twice as illegal as the real event, and they still wouldn't be the same thing. It literally did not take place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child's likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
    Doubling down this hard to say this isn't actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I'm convinced that you're a total creep. I'm sure others are, too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Deepfakes are illegal. You're defending deepfake cp now?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Threats are a crime, but they're a different crime than the act itself.

    Everyone piling on understands that it's kinda fuckin' important to distinguish this crime, specifically, because it's the worst thing imaginable. They just also want to use the same word for shit that did not happen. Both things can be super fucking illegal - but they will never be the same thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent