▲ 648 ▼ China’s ‘artificial sun’ breaks nuclear fusion limit thought to be impossible (www.the-independent.com) submitted 10 months ago by commander@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 189 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago (4 children) That is what they said. Twenty years ago. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) Not only 20 years ago. Source: Takeda, S., Keeley, A.R. & Managi, S. How Many Years Away is Fusion Energy? A Review. J Fusion Energ 42, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-023-00361-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) I know. They have been saying twenty years since I was very young. permalink fedilink source parent [–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago* (1 child) Yes, because the argument was never "we'll have fusion in 20 years", it's always been "we COULD have fusion in 20 years IF research was properly funded". It's never been properly funded, hence it's always 20 years away. It's a bit like my boss coming to ask me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. We don't get funding. 6 months later he comes and asks me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. Queue shocked Pikachu face that the estimate is still 6 months, 6 months later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Fusion would really hurt oil companies, so not going to get funded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) Not only 20 years ago. Source: Takeda, S., Keeley, A.R. & Managi, S. How Many Years Away is Fusion Energy? A Review. J Fusion Energ 42, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-023-00361-z permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) I know. They have been saying twenty years since I was very young. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) I know. They have been saying twenty years since I was very young. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago* (1 child) Yes, because the argument was never "we'll have fusion in 20 years", it's always been "we COULD have fusion in 20 years IF research was properly funded". It's never been properly funded, hence it's always 20 years away. It's a bit like my boss coming to ask me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. We don't get funding. 6 months later he comes and asks me how long it would take to do project X. I tell him 6 months after we get funding. Queue shocked Pikachu face that the estimate is still 6 months, 6 months later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Fusion would really hurt oil companies, so not going to get funded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Fusion would really hurt oil companies, so not going to get funded. permalink fedilink source parent