you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago*

    There's data weights for recency, so after a certain point "next year is 2026" will stop being weighted over "next year is 2027"

    It's early in the year, so that threshold wasn't crossed yet.

  • source
  • parent