you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 10 months ago (22 children)

Are you not able to provide AI with a prompt clear enough for it to do the work you requested without problems?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    Is that the retort your ai recommended?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 10 months ago (20 children)

    Can answer questions with statements?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (19 children)
  • [+] -8 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    Yes, you cannot provide clear prompts. As I suspected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (17 children)

    I'm sorry! You're absolutely correct!

    Would you like to start a new conversation or continue with this one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    I’m happy to end it with me being correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    I'm sorry, you've used up all your tokens for the month. You'll have to prove yourself right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    I’m happy to end it with me being correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    This isn't about you being correct, if that was the case you would focus on your argument instead of giving an empty retort. I suspect this is your attempt to control the conversation. What is your intention with letting us know your motivation is to be perceived as being correct?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Who are you? lol. If you were smart you would scroll up a bit and realize the attempt to control the conversation was when that person did not answer the question I asked. Now, kindly fuck off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I'm not some bot where asking "kindly" will garner a sycophantic agreement. You are talking to people who can make their own value calls in regards to meaningful context, unlike a bot. But the important thing is that you didn't disagree with what I said, and like you I care about being perceived as correct on this matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I’m not going to read your conversation but it feels like you’re trying to take over the conversation. Kindly, fuck off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    If by taking over the conversation you mean giving my own thoughts, then I am as guilty as you are. No one of forcing you to respond.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I see your username again and I imagine you’re trying to take over the conversation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Why do you need to imagine what you claim is already happening?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Just remember, when you accuse others on the Internet it comes off as a confession. Happy to let you expand the conversation but if you only take that opportunity to accuse others of being controlling, well that's certainly interesting and might be tied to your attraction to generative AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments