you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Another factor that seems to get ignored with mirrors vs cameras is depth. A mirror is still a 3D reflection and there’s usually enough depth information to judge distances pretty well. You lose all sense of scale and distance with a lens and screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (1 child)

    objects in mirror are closer than they appear

    (i still have zero idea what this means...is the object closer in the mirror or is closer irl?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    That label is used for convex mirrors that show a wider area at the tradeoff of shrinking things. You get some depth perception in a mirror (unlike a camera, as otacon pointed out), but the shrinkage in a convex mirror throws that off. The object itself (not the reflection) is physically closer to you than what your depth perception on the reflection would indicate.

  • source
  • parent