▲ 5 ▼ Xlibre, a new fork of the X.org X11 server, announced (www.theregister.com) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/linux@programming.dev 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Good to know some people are still working on X. Git repo for those who're interested permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Is it though? Hmm Welp Seriously though, fuck this guy and his project. Refuse to support it. In fact, use an alt account to introduce subtle bugs and flaws to the codebase if you can. It’s always a good day to fuck with Nazis. And this right here is a project run by a Nazi. Edit: if anyone dares to whinge about “getting political” with my comment in this community: this is a screencap of the fucking README.MD. It’s an inherently, overtly political commentary in the project that’s clearly friendly to an authoritarian regime. Fuck all that noise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 year ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? You might want to think about what you said for like 2 more seconds. Why on earth would I not hate or even help someone who aligns themselves with a Nazi? You can absolutely hate the creation of a tool based on the political reasons it is being created. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Is it though? Hmm Welp Seriously though, fuck this guy and his project. Refuse to support it. In fact, use an alt account to introduce subtle bugs and flaws to the codebase if you can. It’s always a good day to fuck with Nazis. And this right here is a project run by a Nazi. Edit: if anyone dares to whinge about “getting political” with my comment in this community: this is a screencap of the fucking README.MD. It’s an inherently, overtly political commentary in the project that’s clearly friendly to an authoritarian regime. Fuck all that noise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 year ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? You might want to think about what you said for like 2 more seconds. Why on earth would I not hate or even help someone who aligns themselves with a Nazi? You can absolutely hate the creation of a tool based on the political reasons it is being created. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 year ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? You might want to think about what you said for like 2 more seconds. Why on earth would I not hate or even help someone who aligns themselves with a Nazi? You can absolutely hate the creation of a tool based on the political reasons it is being created. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) What? You might want to think about what you said for like 2 more seconds. Why on earth would I not hate or even help someone who aligns themselves with a Nazi? You can absolutely hate the creation of a tool based on the political reasons it is being created. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I don't need a project to explicitly say they are DEI inclusive, I generally don't care who is contributing, but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild. The only divide I'm increasing by saying I don't support or respect people who choose to, and makes it very clear they are, excluding people based on diversity is a divide they've created for themselves. Especially when it's a fucking open source software project, like wtf does DEI have to do with it that the owner has to bring it up to begin with if not to intentionally hurt someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) but when you explicitly state you are against it in the README of your project that is just wild It's called a dogwhistle: they're letting other racist scumbags know that they are also racist scumbags and that their racist scumbag views are welcome, without saying anything overtly racist scumbag-y. permalink fedilink source parent