I haven't finished watching it, but it has some very interesting data points on privacy and how your privacy is being exposed even when you think it isn't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

This performs worse in literally every category when compared to ubo. You can check their own white paper if you don't believe me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Useless observation. Adnauseam and uBlock serve two different purposes. A user should only run one of the two at once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    They literally compare themselves to ubo in their own white paper. Are you dense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    They have different goals. You're the one being dense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    What paper specifically are you referring to? I couldnt get the paper from the url that was provided, but I am reading the paper from 2017 linked on their github and this project forked ublock, adding additional features, which is pretty interesting actually. Such as detection of visual ads out of the blocked objects, with a series of checks to see if they are "legitimate ads", then simulated clicks through ajax, with blocks on all response content, preserving security from any malware that may have been masquerading as a legit ad.

    Granted this is from 2017, but its a pretty interesting idea. https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/Published-Papers

    The code itself was updated three weeks ago, so its clearly still being maintained at some level.

    Combine this with containerized user accounts, and seems like a pretty good idea to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment