Newly released files show how Maria Farmer, who worked for Mr. Epstein in the 1990s, had urged the F.B.I. to investigate him. The case went nowhere for years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 10 months ago* (19 children)

This is not reddit and when you make these kinds of insinuations you only ever wind up sounding like a conspiracist or a dolt (perhaps both).

You'll find a large majority of Lemmy instances are pretty critical of the US Democrattic party and rightly so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    You’ll find a large majority of Lemmy instances are pretty critical of the US Democrattic party and rightly so.

    I have not found that to be the case. Say anything less than worshipful of the genocide wing that runs the party and you'll get pushback. Try it for the very first time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    What the actual fuck are you talking about?

    By which I mean your sweeping, obviously inaccurate claims about the userbase, not the genocide, which is definitely happening, happened under the previous administration too, and is extremely fucked up, and likely contributed to the fascists getting elected given how abysmally the DNC handled the entire situation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    You have a lot more issue with my saying that lemmy makes excuses for democrats than you do about the straight up lie that no democrat has ever appointed an FBI chair. Because that lie is there to excuse bad behavior of democrats.

    not the genocide, which is definitely happening, happened under the previous administration too, and is extremely fucked up, and likely contributed to the fascists getting elected given how abysmally the DNC handled the entire situation?

    The prevailing consensus on lemmy is that the democrats did nothing wrong at all and the mean old voters denied them the election.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    Sounds like you may have been banned from communities that are expressing more nuanced opinions. Perhaps because of your fairly obviously dogmatic stance (not on genocide, but on how people are reacting to it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sounds like you may have been banned from communities that are expressing more nuanced opinions.

    Sounds like you're gloating about pro-genocide echo chambers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Try it for the very first time.

    This line just proves that you're not interested in a serious conversation. You'll find in life that if you listen before you talk you'll often learn quite a lot of useful things.

    Take care.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Saying shit like "the Democratic party revolves around genocide" is what gets you push back. Try saying something realistic and people will agree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

    Saying shit like “the Democratic party revolves around genocide” is what gets you push back.

    From people who know it's true, love it, and never want it to change except for the worse. When their actions indicate that they support another policy with greater persistence and enthusiasm, I'll believe the party actually has other policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    No, you just have a weird fixation with associating the Democratic Party with genocide by the looks of your last series of comments. I wouldn't be surprised if your entire comment history is peppered with shit-talking on only one side. It doesn't seem to phase commenters like you that the Trump administration is just as friendly with Israel. How come you're silent about that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    It doesn’t seem to phase commenters like you that the Trump administration is just as friendly with Israel. How come you’re silent about that?

    No one argues with me when I say that trump is pro-genocide, for one. But I'll admit that I'm intensely bitter about democrats' support for genocide. No political party in the US should ever support genocide, and yet even the "good" party does. I'm livid at all the procedural bullshit they applied toward making sure they didn't keep their campaign promises, while breaking actual law to support genocide.

    Just because I fucking hate democrats for what they did, that doesn't mean I don't hate the republicans they keep trying to be for showing them what policies to espouse.

    That said, the insinuation that anyone who has a problem with literal genocide must be a republican is a centrist go-to, and it's the least surprising comment in the whole thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Huh, if only you'd invest that much of your anger towards the administration that's actively trying to engage in genocide right now. Idk if you saw, but that link was from 4 hours ago. Where's the outrage? Or is it that much more important to get your fix by picking a fight on Lemmy about an administration that's not even in power right now?

    the insinuation that anyone who has a problem with literal genocide must be a republican is a centrist go-to.

    The insinuation that anyone who complains about you endlessly complaining about genocide must be a centrist is also quite something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Huh, if only you’d invest that much of your anger towards the administration that’s actively trying to engage in genocide right now.

    Huh, if only you could admit that genocide was wrong, you wouldn't have to keep making allegations that anyone who doesn't love it like you do must be a trumper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If you really believe this, then you have serious reading comprehension skills and/or only interpret everything in a way the reinforces your existing biases . From my experience, a majority of people here, myself included, would happily see both parties burn to the ground and replaced with a system that empowers We The People to choose real representatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment