96
Hey that OS alot of people care about righ now is hiring, please consider & share to other (grapheneos.org)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Qualifications

  • Prior experience working on one or more of Android/AOSP-based operating systems, the Linux kernel and its hardening, memory allocators, or Android app development
  • Strong programming skills in relevant languages (in order from most to least common: Java, Kotlin, C++, C, Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, arm64 assembly, Bash, Python)
  • Need to have enough experience to be comfortable to self direct workloads and submit finished features and fixes ready for review
  • Commitment to privacy and security principles
  • Ideally prior experience contributing to free and open source projects

Salary and remuneration will be commensurate with experience and aligned with industry standards. You will be employed as an independent contractor

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

  1. doesn’t matter as long as they have employees in California

  2. doesn’t state it must be for employees only, it’s for any job posting

Tech workers try to have any spine when it comes to worker’s rights challenge

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Let me do the work for you; since you'd rather just spread FUD then look for facts.

    1. https://www.linkedin.com/company/grapheneos/people/
    • 0 California "employees" listed
    1. https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/SB3_FAQ.htm (I just want to point out that there is a distinction; and I am not a lawyer) "Any individual performing any kind of compensable work for the employer who is not a bona fide independent contractor would be considered and counted as an employee, including salaried executives, part-time workers, minors, and new hires."
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    1. Cool, that’s why my original comment says might. I don’t keep track of where random organizations employ people.

    2. You linked to a page about minimum wage, not the law related to job postings. Again, this law does not state that the posting must be for employee positions.

    Any criticism you don’t like hearing isn’t FUD. This would be a shit practice even if it wasn’t illegal in California.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    It isn't criticism if it isn't based on fact. The U in FUD stands for Uncertainty; and what do you think "might" falls under, or it's relation to sowing Doubt?

    The law related to job postings, is a labor law, that also covers minimum wage, and uses the same definitions. Labor Code Section 432.3 (Pay Transparency Law) Labor Code Section 1197.5 - California Equal Pay Act (Fair Pay Act) Labor Code Section 2750.3 (Employee vs Independent Contractor Classification)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent