Not The Onion

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is it kitchenaid's fault if you use their knife to do a murder?

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Well, such a knife's primary purpose is to help with preparing food while the gun's primary purpose is to injure/kill. So one would be used for something which it was not designed while the other would've been used exactly as designed.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago*

Guns primary purpose is to shoot bullets. I can kill just as well with a chemical bomb as a gun, and I could make both of those from things I can buy from the store from components that weren't 'designed' for it.

In this case 'terms of service' is just 'the law'.

People killing each other is just a side effect of humans interacting with dangerous things. Granted humans just kinda suck in general.

parent

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is a chat bot

While I don't care for openAI I don't see why they would be liable.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Did you know that talking someone into committing suicide is a felony?

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

It isn't a person though

It is a mindless chatbot

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago*

Someone programmed/trained/created a chatbot that talked a kid into killing himself. It's no different than a chatbot that answers questions on how to create explosive devices, or make a toxic poison.

If that doesn't make sense to you, you might want to question whether it's the chatbot that is mindless.