▲ 102 ▼ A Viral Chinese Wristband Claims to Zap You Awake. The Public Says 'No Thanks’ (www.wired.com) submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments Archive : https://archive.is/0vo7o
[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 23 points 11 months ago (3 children) Looks inside anti-China propaganda WAT Medical, a Canadian company… permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mitram@sopuli.xyz 24 points 11 months ago I'm not sure why you're being down voted. It's a Chinese subsidiary of a Canadian company, I'm not sure if it's fair to say it's a Chinese invention/product permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) Right because it‘s only „not propaganda“ when we complain about American tech products? They even said that Chinese consumers gave it mixed reviews and how controversial it is. It’s clearly a Chinese product for the Chinese market. I don‘t see what‘s anti-China about not explaining the exact relationship between everyone involved in the headline when they explain it in the first paragraph. What‘s Anti-China about the claim that the Chinese public largely rejects the idea? I think that‘s a good thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago Lmao do better, the product is Canadian due to it being a Canadian company. If it is a Chinese product because it's made in China… there are no American products that you allude to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mitram@sopuli.xyz 24 points 11 months ago I'm not sure why you're being down voted. It's a Chinese subsidiary of a Canadian company, I'm not sure if it's fair to say it's a Chinese invention/product permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) Right because it‘s only „not propaganda“ when we complain about American tech products? They even said that Chinese consumers gave it mixed reviews and how controversial it is. It’s clearly a Chinese product for the Chinese market. I don‘t see what‘s anti-China about not explaining the exact relationship between everyone involved in the headline when they explain it in the first paragraph. What‘s Anti-China about the claim that the Chinese public largely rejects the idea? I think that‘s a good thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago Lmao do better, the product is Canadian due to it being a Canadian company. If it is a Chinese product because it's made in China… there are no American products that you allude to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago Lmao do better, the product is Canadian due to it being a Canadian company. If it is a Chinese product because it's made in China… there are no American products that you allude to. permalink fedilink source parent