you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago (10 children)

There being zero ecosystem for Linux phones, unlike the desktop.

You'd need an Android runtime layer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    How many things to you really use your phone for anyway.

    Personally all I need is the basic things like a camera app, maps, authenticator, web browser, pdf reader, note taker, clock, etc.

    It's really not that much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Banking/financial apps are the biggest sticking point that I keep hearing about. They won't run on a non-Google Android, let alone an AOSP container in Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Anything I can do through my banking app I could just as email do through the browser

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You won't be able to do NFC payments over just a web browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Never used this feature. I think this sort of QOL feature is something I'd be happy to wait on. The ecosystem doesn't need this to launch at least imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    No the vast majority of people really don't need this. The feature can be nice to have. If you don't have it you'll go around tapping your credit card like normal. That's how I see most people around me make payments.

    You could make the argument that not having these bells and whistles can make your platform seem less attractive and to an extent that might be true but I think you're missing the point.

    No one said Linux phones should launch and be immediately competitive with android/apple flagship products day one.

    People who care enough about FOSS and privacy have ample reason to accept the trade off of not having some of these niche features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Web browsers can work from day one. I used my web browser for all my mobile banking for months when a bug rendered the app unusable.

    Tap payments might not work until banks make apps for it (or more likely until android compatibility layers are provided) but you'd have to be pretty petulant to suggest that this feature not having first class support from day one makes a device unusable.

    Google is going the way of apple-like full control over their mobile devices while even lower end modern day phones are easily capable of surpassing the computational needs of 99 percent of daily users. The use case for mobile linux devices is growing all the while cost per unit sold decreases.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    They're famous for making (or at least greatly improving) such comparability layers.

    Steam os can run Windows apps.
    There is talk of steam frame (with an arm processor) running x86 apps.

    So I say there would be a fair chance that we'd get decent compatibility/ Although idk if they actually would want to get into that market.

  • source
  • parent