you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

Wasn't his ideal to simulate a brain?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Neural networks don't simulate a brain, it's a misconception caused by their name. They have nothing to do with brain neurons

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not what I meant. What I mean is: this could be the path he would go for, since his desire was to make a stimulated person (AI).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    LLM are not the path to go forward to simulate a person, this is a fact. By design they cannot reason, it's not a matter of advancement, it's literally how they work as a principle. It's a statistical trick to generate random texts that look like thought out phrases, no reasoning involved.

    If someone tells you they might be the way forward to simulate a human, they are scamming you. No one who actually knows how they work says that unless they are a CEO of a trillion dollar company selling AI.

  • source
  • parent