37
KeePassXC doubles down on AI use (keepassxc.org)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I was alarmed by this post, but after reading the linked text, I am not worried. I certainly understand the distaste for AI, and I share much of it. However, the approach here seems very sensible and the proof will continue to be in the pudding.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    However, the approach here seems very sensible and the proof will continue to be in the pudding.

    The argument made by guys for abolishing food inspectors.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The KeePassXC team just knowingly introduced a policy that is proven to produce vulnerable code into a software project where there is next to no margin for error and you are asking why we are upset? They can keep their vibe coded password manager.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Then go be an AI slop enjoyer somewhere else. You have a whole internet full of it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • load more comments (-1 replies)
    • load more comments (-1 replies)