you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

lol this thread is off the rails and should probably get modded

My summary of the conversation so far: @PugJesus@piefed.social offered evidence of some (supposedly controversial) event. @Objection@lemmy.ml rejected it outright without offering any competing evidence. Both are, according to the other, somehow a variety of fascist bootlicker. The shitposting aura is weak; too serious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    lol this thread is off the rails and should probably get modded

    Yes, it should be. I was trying to shitpost in peace when PJ comes here trying to start shit with me to distract from another conversation in order to weasel out of providing any evidence.

    offered evidence of some (supposedly controversial) event.

    Lol no he did not. Not even a shred. On principle, even.

    See, I'm accused of being a witch, and by asking for proof that any witchcraft actually happened I'm questioning the Inquisition and proving my guilt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, it should be. I was trying to shitpost in peace

    LMAO

    You commented on one of my conversations in this thread, not the other way around.

    Are you a pathological liar, or just a habitual one?

    Or are you so detached from reality that you can't tell the difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I mixed up the threads, which wouldn't have happened if you hadn't followed me around dragging it out into another thread in a desperate attempt to weasel out of providing the evidence that you don't have because it doesn't exist.

    Evidence or GTFO.

  • source
  • parent