▲ 516 ▼ Apple sued by shareholders for allegedly overstating AI progress (www.reuters.com) submitted 1 year ago by IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) Was Safari for Windows a good, bad, or average product? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 year ago I remember at one point the front-end guys I knew were laughing that it didn't even support iframes. But I imagine it eventually got decent enough. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* Generally, Safari was kind of middling in function and design until around 2018, when it got more streamlined or something; at least, its apparent performance improved over the other browsers on macOS. It was novel on Windows but pretty limited and just, meh. Edit: I forgot, the clean, minimalist, ad free reader view on the windows version was very nice to have. Long time ago! permalink fedilink source parent [–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago It was fun! It worked well when compared with IE back in the day which isn't saying much, but it was a sensible bedfellow with iTunes and all the Apple mobile support software that was common to run alongside for your iPod. I enjoyed using it as my main browser because it was aesthetically pleasing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Normal. I used Opera. QuickTime player for Windows was nice. Used it under W2K for most of media things in the interwebs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 year ago I remember at one point the front-end guys I knew were laughing that it didn't even support iframes. But I imagine it eventually got decent enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* Generally, Safari was kind of middling in function and design until around 2018, when it got more streamlined or something; at least, its apparent performance improved over the other browsers on macOS. It was novel on Windows but pretty limited and just, meh. Edit: I forgot, the clean, minimalist, ad free reader view on the windows version was very nice to have. Long time ago! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago It was fun! It worked well when compared with IE back in the day which isn't saying much, but it was a sensible bedfellow with iTunes and all the Apple mobile support software that was common to run alongside for your iPod. I enjoyed using it as my main browser because it was aesthetically pleasing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Normal. I used Opera. QuickTime player for Windows was nice. Used it under W2K for most of media things in the interwebs. permalink fedilink source parent