you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -54 points 1 year ago (16 children)

so their art is so bad it was mistaken for ai? weird flex but ok.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    More like, "This is the only one that doesn't look like shit."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    more like "ooble gooble mordi bordi"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I thought it was a pretty bizarre idea, to submit real art to a garbage fake art contest. And then post about it like it makes an obvious point or something. Not sure why they did that or what they think it means that they won

    Edit: I take it the downvoters don't understand it either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Human art, even when claimed to be AI, conveys emotion and connects with people through it. Generative images lack the expression of emotion, and so they are found lacking connection when compared to art from a human of even moderate skill.

  • source
  • parent