you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago

to summarize the conclusions thus far, as is my secretary duty

amendments to the protocol of this EU directive are as follows in the first line of stallings amendments:

TECO is to be legacy alternative to EMACS and all personell are to be provided paid leave for educational purposes.

ED is to be legacy alternative to VIM and all personell are to be provided paid leave for educational purposes.

up for further discussion: are ideologically united editors such as VILE (VI Like Emacs) middleground or offensive to both parties? is it right of marginalized editors to invoke a non-monopolyculture clause: "will SAM or VIS be up for consideration?" asks [name redacted under GDPR]

  • source