▲ 199 ▼ Mathematics disproves Matrix theory, says reality isn’t simulation (interestingengineering.com) submitted 1 year ago by RegularJoe@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments And here I was waiting to get unplugged, or maybe finding a Nokia phone that received a call.
[+] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io -5 points 1 year ago (1 child) My bad. Of course you’re right. I’ve dreamt that levitation is possible. Therefore, levitation is possible in reality. QED permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago The question is rather What is "reality": the dream (et al.) or the physical world (what you describe as reality). See Descartes first two meditations (and note that he relies fully on the existence of God to prove the existence of reality later). In this case, us experiencing a "dream" just serves to outline the point; Descartes, for example, also suggests that we are being fooled by an evil daemon. If it's a dream or an evil daemon — doesn't matter; it would likely be something entirely beyond our comprehension anyway. But genuinely proving the physical world as being reality is very difficult. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io -5 points 1 year ago (1 child) My bad. Of course you’re right. I’ve dreamt that levitation is possible. Therefore, levitation is possible in reality. QED permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago The question is rather What is "reality": the dream (et al.) or the physical world (what you describe as reality). See Descartes first two meditations (and note that he relies fully on the existence of God to prove the existence of reality later). In this case, us experiencing a "dream" just serves to outline the point; Descartes, for example, also suggests that we are being fooled by an evil daemon. If it's a dream or an evil daemon — doesn't matter; it would likely be something entirely beyond our comprehension anyway. But genuinely proving the physical world as being reality is very difficult. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago The question is rather What is "reality": the dream (et al.) or the physical world (what you describe as reality). See Descartes first two meditations (and note that he relies fully on the existence of God to prove the existence of reality later). In this case, us experiencing a "dream" just serves to outline the point; Descartes, for example, also suggests that we are being fooled by an evil daemon. If it's a dream or an evil daemon — doesn't matter; it would likely be something entirely beyond our comprehension anyway. But genuinely proving the physical world as being reality is very difficult. permalink fedilink source parent