iii comments on Danish Presidency backs away from 'chat control'

[–] iii@mander.xyz 25 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

Meaning they still don't understand that it's morally disgusting to scan everyone's private communications. They're just annoyed that people care.

Their proposal should be explicitly outlawed, privacy should be a human right.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Yeah, it happens surprisingly often.

Even for people that aren't too knowledgeble or care about it, it's usually a good indicator if it's a "bad thing" when the ministers themselves are exempt from what is being proposed.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

"Rules for thee but not for me" specifically needs to be outlawed. Anything the ruling class wants to impose on the people gets the same rules applied to them.

But we all know that never happens.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent