you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -17 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It would obviously allow people to live in cheaper committees and commute into the more expensive ones alleviating some of the issues.

    Why are you so defensive and mean about someone bringing that up? Seems like you might have some issues

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes but he said "high speed rail" which is popular here so now you're getting downvoted.

    You're right of course. It's an idiotic take.

    It's kinda like saying housing would be a lot better if there were more forest rangers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's kinda like saying housing would be a lot better if there were more forest rangers.

    How is that at all the same?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's because I'm agreeing with the person and not rebutting the original comment. Which I have no desire to do.

    But I will say this if you think high speed rail will impact housing in California you're an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)