77
Should a PvPvE game have to offer a PvE-only mode? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/games@sh.itjust.works
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Arc Raiders had a free playtest this weekend, and some players are arguing that the game needs a PvE-only mode. In the game players are tasked with scavenging resources from an open map infested with enemy robots alongside other players, with players not in your group effectively being another type of enemy. This, of course, has some players saying that fighting enemy robots is enough, that they don't need the extra stress of having to fight off other players too. The pro-PvP players are, of course, saying that this is what the game is, and if you don't like it you should go play something else.

It's not like that's never been done before. Sea of Thieves is another PvPvE game, and not too long ago it too got a PvE-only mode.

What do you say about this? Should a game that wants to be both PvE and PvP also offer exclusive modes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago

I think it would be a nice thing to include as not everyone wants to interact with other players if they don't need to. But I don't think it should be an obligation.

It sounds like a concept that I could enjoy, but I probably won't play it if there isn't a PvE mode. I play video games so I don't have to interact with people. But I'm not going to buy it knowing there isn't a PvE mode and then complain that there isn't one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •