▲ 243 ▼ [Video] Kamala Harris becomes visibly shaken and furious after being called a “right-wing war criminal” (i.imgur.com) submitted 1 year ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world 402 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (9 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right in the middle permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) OK, so you live here. Do you need me to provide evidence for the widespread support for Israel among the voting population? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Uh? what? Among progressives. Among Dem voters? Among Muslims? Among the people the dems needed their votes? How many polls? Lol the support wasn't enough to win her an election. So Ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Among Americans in general. If she opposed Israel she would have lost outright. There likely will not be an anti-Israel candidate in the Oval Office any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (8 children) Right in the middle permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) OK, so you live here. Do you need me to provide evidence for the widespread support for Israel among the voting population? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Uh? what? Among progressives. Among Dem voters? Among Muslims? Among the people the dems needed their votes? How many polls? Lol the support wasn't enough to win her an election. So Ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Among Americans in general. If she opposed Israel she would have lost outright. There likely will not be an anti-Israel candidate in the Oval Office any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) OK, so you live here. Do you need me to provide evidence for the widespread support for Israel among the voting population? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Uh? what? Among progressives. Among Dem voters? Among Muslims? Among the people the dems needed their votes? How many polls? Lol the support wasn't enough to win her an election. So Ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Among Americans in general. If she opposed Israel she would have lost outright. There likely will not be an anti-Israel candidate in the Oval Office any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (6 children) Uh? what? Among progressives. Among Dem voters? Among Muslims? Among the people the dems needed their votes? How many polls? Lol the support wasn't enough to win her an election. So Ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Among Americans in general. If she opposed Israel she would have lost outright. There likely will not be an anti-Israel candidate in the Oval Office any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) Among Americans in general. If she opposed Israel she would have lost outright. There likely will not be an anti-Israel candidate in the Oval Office any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Among Americans in general. Americans in general includes every last republican who would never vote for her. Centrist democrats need to quit trying to get the fascist vote just because they deeply admire all fascists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) And I'm sorry but this just hit me. she would have lost outright. She would have lost outright... She. Would. Have. Lost. Outright. Compared to... (check notes) Lossing!? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) An outright loss means she would never have a chance of winning. Taking the much less popular view would not make it more likely for her to win. Did you really need that clarified for you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Outright So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) being anti genicide doesn't make you anti Israel. Simply not giving them the tools to do harm wouldn't even be enough. We need to actively protect both sides from each other, and return to original boundaries. That's not anti Israel. That's pro human. permalink fedilink source parent