▲ 243 ▼ [Video] Kamala Harris becomes visibly shaken and furious after being called a “right-wing war criminal” (i.imgur.com) submitted 1 year ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world 402 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] petersr@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (9 children) Where exactly is she shaken? I only see her standing up for a splitsecond and then a smirk at the end. permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] reptar@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) I know this is very very old news / old man yells at clouds but, Couldn't you just slap "visibly shaken" onto fucking anything? Headlines suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago No doubt. Every other day there's something claiming that dtRump has gone "off the rails" or is "having a meltdown". Or Stephen Miller. Or Musk. Show proof, clickbait-whoring pimps. This video showed no proof. Pretty much the opposite of what was stated in the headline. Protestor interrupts Kamala pimping her book with accusations of right wing genocide & responsibility for getting Trump in office, she replies with a smirk Would that be a more accurate header? I think so. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago That smirk makes me unreasonably angry. That protester was 100% correct, and there's zero self-reflection. She's out there flogging her books when she should be mounting an opposition. permalink fedilink source parent [+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children) I think I just expect shaken in a non-angry way. And maybe more than 5 frames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago Shaken, but not stirred. permalink fedilink source parent [+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Ah yes - a shaken face. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Isn't that just "hey security get the screaming lady" face? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Squeebah@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago Gotta sensationalize everything to get those updoots! permalink fedilink source parent [–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago She's on pills I didn't believe the headline for a second permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] reptar@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) I know this is very very old news / old man yells at clouds but, Couldn't you just slap "visibly shaken" onto fucking anything? Headlines suck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago No doubt. Every other day there's something claiming that dtRump has gone "off the rails" or is "having a meltdown". Or Stephen Miller. Or Musk. Show proof, clickbait-whoring pimps. This video showed no proof. Pretty much the opposite of what was stated in the headline. Protestor interrupts Kamala pimping her book with accusations of right wing genocide & responsibility for getting Trump in office, she replies with a smirk Would that be a more accurate header? I think so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago No doubt. Every other day there's something claiming that dtRump has gone "off the rails" or is "having a meltdown". Or Stephen Miller. Or Musk. Show proof, clickbait-whoring pimps. This video showed no proof. Pretty much the opposite of what was stated in the headline. Protestor interrupts Kamala pimping her book with accusations of right wing genocide & responsibility for getting Trump in office, she replies with a smirk Would that be a more accurate header? I think so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago That smirk makes me unreasonably angry. That protester was 100% correct, and there's zero self-reflection. She's out there flogging her books when she should be mounting an opposition. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children) I think I just expect shaken in a non-angry way. And maybe more than 5 frames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago Shaken, but not stirred. permalink fedilink source parent [+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Ah yes - a shaken face. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Isn't that just "hey security get the screaming lady" face? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] petersr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children) I think I just expect shaken in a non-angry way. And maybe more than 5 frames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago Shaken, but not stirred. permalink fedilink source parent [+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Ah yes - a shaken face. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago Shaken, but not stirred. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] petersr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Ah yes - a shaken face. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Isn't that just "hey security get the screaming lady" face? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Squeebah@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago Gotta sensationalize everything to get those updoots! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago She's on pills I didn't believe the headline for a second permalink fedilink source parent