▲ 881 ▼ A cut, sure, but the whole fuckin thing? (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 1 year ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] jared@mander.xyz 29 points 1 year ago (8 children) Protection racket. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 1 year ago (7 children) Insurance has its place. How much it costs, how much they fight to help you when it comes time, those are the problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (6 children) The fact that for-investor-profit insurance companies exist are the problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Darkard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children) The fact it's run for profit AND is a mandatory requirement to having a car. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago If it wasn't required the cost for those who pay in to cover uninsured accidents would be much higher. But I do agree that like many other things, if we nationalized the cost and eliminated profit we could drop the individual price. It would also help to use federal influence to provide other means than individual cars for transportation, less cars resulting in less risk on the road. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) The second part is a good thing. It's how people get paid when someone damages their property (or causes physical harm) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago and one that is subsidized by taxpayers anyways. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 1 year ago (7 children) Insurance has its place. How much it costs, how much they fight to help you when it comes time, those are the problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (6 children) The fact that for-investor-profit insurance companies exist are the problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Darkard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children) The fact it's run for profit AND is a mandatory requirement to having a car. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago If it wasn't required the cost for those who pay in to cover uninsured accidents would be much higher. But I do agree that like many other things, if we nationalized the cost and eliminated profit we could drop the individual price. It would also help to use federal influence to provide other means than individual cars for transportation, less cars resulting in less risk on the road. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) The second part is a good thing. It's how people get paid when someone damages their property (or causes physical harm) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago and one that is subsidized by taxpayers anyways. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (6 children) The fact that for-investor-profit insurance companies exist are the problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Darkard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children) The fact it's run for profit AND is a mandatory requirement to having a car. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago If it wasn't required the cost for those who pay in to cover uninsured accidents would be much higher. But I do agree that like many other things, if we nationalized the cost and eliminated profit we could drop the individual price. It would also help to use federal influence to provide other means than individual cars for transportation, less cars resulting in less risk on the road. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) The second part is a good thing. It's how people get paid when someone damages their property (or causes physical harm) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago and one that is subsidized by taxpayers anyways. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children) The fact it's run for profit AND is a mandatory requirement to having a car. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago If it wasn't required the cost for those who pay in to cover uninsured accidents would be much higher. But I do agree that like many other things, if we nationalized the cost and eliminated profit we could drop the individual price. It would also help to use federal influence to provide other means than individual cars for transportation, less cars resulting in less risk on the road. permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) The second part is a good thing. It's how people get paid when someone damages their property (or causes physical harm) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago If it wasn't required the cost for those who pay in to cover uninsured accidents would be much higher. But I do agree that like many other things, if we nationalized the cost and eliminated profit we could drop the individual price. It would also help to use federal influence to provide other means than individual cars for transportation, less cars resulting in less risk on the road. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) The second part is a good thing. It's how people get paid when someone damages their property (or causes physical harm) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Everybody's like: I'm a good driver I don't need insurance. But they always forget that half the drivers on the road are below average, and your insurance covers you in the event of a hit and run. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Or even simple accidents. You can be the safest driver in the world and some things are just unavoidable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago and one that is subsidized by taxpayers anyways. permalink fedilink source parent