Honest question: have you published in math journals?

No, but I know enough about AI - for having to correct the seemingly good but actually deeply flawed code it generates at work - to know that if you don't triple-check what it does, it'll create unreliable shit in any field of exact science.

If a human can triple-check a math proof done by AI, chances are the human could have come up with the proof themselves. Conversely, a proof so complex that only an AI can come up with it, that's beyond a human mind's grasp - something you would very much like help from a reliable AI with - will be untrustworthy almost by definition.

That's the long version of my snarky remark.

Important point: most of your visual field is being hallucinated via interpolation between points recently sampled by your foveae. Hallucination is as fundamental to animal cognition as it is to machine cognition.

I don't do math with my fovea. The whole point of math is to escape our animal senses and manipulate universal truths.

Incidentally, I didn't downmod you. I don't think that's fair. Those who did are probably just AI haters having a gut reaction.

Here, I'll upmod you in fact 🙂 Just because I disagree with the whole concept doesn't mean you're responsible for it 🙂