Better text to speech and speech to text, automatic image descriptions, better translations.

ChatGPT and the likes can also be used to access content without ads nor license

Also you can write the letters "AI" on a paper and rich people will give you money. They'll want it back eventually but hey

Coderabbit for PR reviews at work has both impressed me and made me aggregated by how incorrect some of the comments are. It's like, it's caught bugs that i would have missed even when looking very closely but also makes the same suggestions to over complicate chunks or suggestions that literally don't work. Such as assuming the db schema when looking at a query and saying "that's not what the column is called".

So, that's best I've experienced really, basically a PR check that's able to find some really out there bugs but a lot of comments need to be ignored.

Besides improving grammar in emails, no, not really

1.) A convoluted way to search for sources about a thing I know nothing about. I looked up how property deeds work and gemini gave me a rough summary and enough links to actually find out what I needed to know. For anything I do know about, just plain google suffices.

2.) Vulcan straight man for comedy routines.

A few developers I know are very impressed by Claude.

Do they have an AI program that filters out AI content yet? That might be good.

Is there any smaller, "semantic search"-oriented model, rather than all the coding agents?

I think Adobe's new generative fill is supposed to be pretty good? It's just a more complicated version of their much older content-aware fill.