▲ 263 ▼ OpenAI supremo Sam Altman says he 'doesn't know how' he would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 1 year ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (6 children) He’s married. I mean why are you surprised, he’s not a bad looking guy and is very successful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) Calling him successful is technically true, but it kind of glosses over some very pertinent details of his success. He's a billionaire, and you don't get to be a billionaire without doing a lot of monstrous things to good people. The surprise isn't whether he's good looking enough to get a partner. The surprise is over the fact that there's another human being who thinks that those are qualities worth overlooking, especially one who's queer, since billionaires like Sam Altman support the current regime that's wholly against LGBTQ+ folks. And that same person with questionable tastes in partners wanted to take care of another human being with Sam Altman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah, this. Same thing with Elon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago doesnt look like it, elon has a breeding eugenics fetish. he has a breeding fetish like that 17bn-aire that just announced he will give his inhertience to his 100+children. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Saying someone’s is successful is not a moral judgement or approval of their character. Sam Altman is successful, Elon Musk is successful, all of these billionaires that built companies that have changed the world for better or wrong are all successful. This in no way means that I’m saying they’re good people or even that they are people that should be emulated or any other sort of moral judgement. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Anything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now. He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (3 children) Calling him successful is technically true, but it kind of glosses over some very pertinent details of his success. He's a billionaire, and you don't get to be a billionaire without doing a lot of monstrous things to good people. The surprise isn't whether he's good looking enough to get a partner. The surprise is over the fact that there's another human being who thinks that those are qualities worth overlooking, especially one who's queer, since billionaires like Sam Altman support the current regime that's wholly against LGBTQ+ folks. And that same person with questionable tastes in partners wanted to take care of another human being with Sam Altman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah, this. Same thing with Elon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago doesnt look like it, elon has a breeding eugenics fetish. he has a breeding fetish like that 17bn-aire that just announced he will give his inhertience to his 100+children. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Saying someone’s is successful is not a moral judgement or approval of their character. Sam Altman is successful, Elon Musk is successful, all of these billionaires that built companies that have changed the world for better or wrong are all successful. This in no way means that I’m saying they’re good people or even that they are people that should be emulated or any other sort of moral judgement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah, this. Same thing with Elon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago doesnt look like it, elon has a breeding eugenics fetish. he has a breeding fetish like that 17bn-aire that just announced he will give his inhertience to his 100+children. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago doesnt look like it, elon has a breeding eugenics fetish. he has a breeding fetish like that 17bn-aire that just announced he will give his inhertience to his 100+children. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Saying someone’s is successful is not a moral judgement or approval of their character. Sam Altman is successful, Elon Musk is successful, all of these billionaires that built companies that have changed the world for better or wrong are all successful. This in no way means that I’m saying they’re good people or even that they are people that should be emulated or any other sort of moral judgement. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Anything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now. He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Anything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now. He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that. permalink fedilink source parent