Seems like some life insurance could have helped mitigate the impact. That reminds me I should get some.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No contest on these points. Everything was fair and above board by the government. What is unfortunate is that the couple that passed could not take the best tax advantage of their careful savings over their entire investment period. Some insurance would certainly have helped to protect that, again legal and above board.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Definitely don't appreciate those accusations, that's unwarranted. Yes the math works in their favour overall. It's a statistical model spread over their entire customer base. But the point of insurance is for when the unlikely happens, that's why you have it. You hope you never need it, but it might happen. Don't tell me you don't have home/auto insurance; that'd be wild.

    Edit: Also, please remember the community this is. I think it's prudent to discuss how insurance fits into the overall financial picture. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MiyapguxKbQ

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)