▲ 931 ▼ Disney+ cancellation page crashes as customers rush to quit after Kimmel suspension (creators.yahoo.com) submitted 1 year ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago (6 children) damn why didn't I think of that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago That's just making it harder for people who actually want to quit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kokesh@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) ... and I added abc.com and disney+ to dns rewrite in my network to group pointing to ip 666.666.666.666. So no disney for anyone visiting our accommodation and outdoor adventures. They can watch it over their own data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Whatever software you're using needs to scrub its input better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) 666 isn't a valid octet for IPv4. Whatever DNS resolver your using shouldn't allow it in the field. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago That's just making it harder for people who actually want to quit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) ... and I added abc.com and disney+ to dns rewrite in my network to group pointing to ip 666.666.666.666. So no disney for anyone visiting our accommodation and outdoor adventures. They can watch it over their own data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Whatever software you're using needs to scrub its input better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) 666 isn't a valid octet for IPv4. Whatever DNS resolver your using shouldn't allow it in the field. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Whatever software you're using needs to scrub its input better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) 666 isn't a valid octet for IPv4. Whatever DNS resolver your using shouldn't allow it in the field. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) 666 isn't a valid octet for IPv4. Whatever DNS resolver your using shouldn't allow it in the field. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) 666 isn't a valid octet for IPv4. Whatever DNS resolver your using shouldn't allow it in the field. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Obviously. But Adguard allowed it somehow permalink fedilink source parent