Bluesky’s moderation team has suspended dozens of people for saying "rest in piss" while sharing posts about Charlie Kirk.

Archived: https://archive.is/Z8NPc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Yeah. If you want an alternative I'd recommend mastodon because from what I've seen at least it's not as brain dead

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 year ago (14 children)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Fascists can set up an instance, sure. The difference is that that's one instance among many. The worst fediverse instances aren't federated with anybody because the entire instance has been blocked by virtually every other instance.

    IMO that's much better than even the best monolithic social media site. A monolithic site has to have a set of rules that applies for everyone. You can add your own additional blocks, but you can't unblock things that the monolithic site has decided should be blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Those monolith sites have government hooks in them to manipulate those rules so they are not applied equally.

    It was bad before 2020, now it is a joke. They find other things to violate you on for israel comments for instance. Things not against the rules or a real stretch to claim so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    "Government hooks"? Please.

    This is just trying to play nice with investors and/or advertisers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I said government for brevity, the super rich and corporations control the government and they both have their hooks in. The lawmakers have been threatening to jam them up in multiple ways if they do not cave to pressure which they have. Such as agency sending lists of accounts to ban for unrelated reasons. Or allowing some allies of the politicians too get a pass on moderation while taking a hard line against other voices online. Or allowing connected influence operations free reign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Whether it's for brevity or directly, you're wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hardly, government and powerful industries have their hooks in social media.

    You disagree you do not provide a single counter argument as to why it's wrong, which it obviously is not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're the one making an assertion, you prove it's true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Believe what you want, it is not my job to convert random trolls that cannot be bothered to explain why they disagree with something., anyone saying you're wrong without actually making any points as to why is a troll. And not a very good one.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Mastodon is still federated and while there are going to be some instances run by bad actors the majority of them aren't as bad. From what I understand at least mastodon.social is defederated with the bad instances anyway so we can't interact with each other but I may be wrong I'm kind of new to this type of platform

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)