you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I think it's both true that you can't really write an entire app with just AI... At least not easily.

But also I don't buy that AI doesn't make me more productive. I'm not allowed to use it on my actual code but I have used it several times to generate one-off scripts and visualisations and for those it can easily save hours. They aren't software I need to edit myself though.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Pretty much everyone I've talked to about this says the same thing. LLMs are useful for one-off scripts or quickly generating boilerplate. It just turns out that those tasks don't make up the majority of programming work unless you are in a bullshit job anyway.

    We aren't yet great at knowing when LLM will save time and when it will inflate time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    If only we libraries online of boilerplate crap with a few options to transfom them slightly... We'd need a lot less datacentres

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We should have tools and libraries that help us avoid boilerplate, not ones that help us write more of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes!

    I'm not even a programmer, but lot of this is really dictated by the language, isn't it? (C or .Net, for example - and all the default crap needed for UI elements I've had to endure in Powershell, which was probably calling a .Net library)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    C at least has a preprocessor. C# has almost nothing except generators, which are a huge pain in the ass. Java seems to be similar.

    Lisp is the greatest. Everything else is in between.

  • source
  • parent