I know Intel is dipping its toe into the GPU market, but let's be real, AMD and nVidia are the only options and have been for the last 20+ years. The manufacturers/assemblers of the complete graphics cards are varied and widespread, but the core tech comes from two companies only.

Why is this the case? Or am I mistaken and am just brainwashed by marketing, and there are in fact other viable options for GPUs?

Cheers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AMD gpus are inside in Xbox and ps5, without taking into account the handhelds like steam deck.

For the ML is usually better to use amd cards because they use to have more vram, and many many models can be trained using amd.

And about the transcoding comment I will bother myself ait it.

In summary, tells me you don't have any clue without telling me you don't have any clue

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    AMD are not better than Nvidia -> sure

    I prefer Nvidia than AMD for everything -> perfect, it is your opinion and a respetable one

    With AMD you can not do AAA gaming, ML or just transcoding -> a lie, simply, nothing more to add

    And I will ignore the sentence about AMD not being a serious company because it is too absurd to discuss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)