▲ 761 ▼ MAGA Puts Wikipedia in Its Crosshairs (gizmodo.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 148 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Random stretch is random permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why do you think they just grabbed 10% of Intel? One of the biggest criticism of AI summaries is you could just look at Wikipedia... So you crush Wikipedia and then people can't say AI is useless. It ain't a stretch, it's basic logical reasoning, can you not see how that would work or do you not understand how trump could do something as unethical and destroy a free resource to make a buck? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago Oh I totally understand that trump would do that, I just think you're reaching because you have started from the position that "AI is bad mmmkay" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why do you think they just grabbed 10% of Intel? One of the biggest criticism of AI summaries is you could just look at Wikipedia... So you crush Wikipedia and then people can't say AI is useless. It ain't a stretch, it's basic logical reasoning, can you not see how that would work or do you not understand how trump could do something as unethical and destroy a free resource to make a buck? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago Oh I totally understand that trump would do that, I just think you're reaching because you have started from the position that "AI is bad mmmkay" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago Oh I totally understand that trump would do that, I just think you're reaching because you have started from the position that "AI is bad mmmkay" permalink fedilink source parent