you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bikes get a 2000 bikes per hour throughout on a 1 meter (3 feet) wide lane. Cars can get about 1900 vehicles per hour on a regular lane. Give bikes the same space as you give cars and bikes move a lot more people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    How is that an assumption at all? If you provide the same amount of infrastructure for bikes as for cars, then you still have half the infrastructure for cars, so people can use both / either.

    And for those of us living in places where we don’t have bike friendly infrastructure, it’s useful to be able to point out that converting car infra to bike infra would have the capacity to reduce congestion, particularly if the area commits to making those changes more widely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Its not bike friendly enough if you'd rather drive. There is a typhoon right now and its still more pleasant to casually motorbike through the city, at my own pace, completely unimpeded by traffic, looking for anything interesting, and park 3 feet from the entrance than to fuck with driving, slowing for traffic, pulling over to let someone pass because I'm not going fast enough, finding parking, walking through the rain and water streaming down the sidewalks.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)