▲ 148 ▼ Gamers Nexus' response to Nvidia black market documentary getting taken down (www.youtube.com) submitted 1 year ago by simple@piefed.social to c/videos@lemmy.world 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments Very suspicious behavior from Bloomberg. I'm putting them on my block list
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 15 points 1 year ago (6 children) Hopefully they setup a peertube. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) So it can be unwatchable with buffering every 5 seconds at 360p? Love me some alternative self host but every time I've ever tried any peertube instance the videos are unwatchable due to the painful slowness permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) That just means you're not hosting your own instance&client. It takes me seconds to load on a popular video, at the most popular resolution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) If i have to host my own instance and client to get usable results it's a non starter for 99% the population. I do want better than YouTube in terms of open and privacy but not if the only possible trade is removing all sense of usability permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) YouTube has been dominating 99% of it's competition by taking 75+% revenues of everyone, analytics, and portfolio shenanigans. It's entirely upto you if you want to deal with a fascist website than dogfood your VOD experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) So it can be unwatchable with buffering every 5 seconds at 360p? Love me some alternative self host but every time I've ever tried any peertube instance the videos are unwatchable due to the painful slowness permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) That just means you're not hosting your own instance&client. It takes me seconds to load on a popular video, at the most popular resolution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) If i have to host my own instance and client to get usable results it's a non starter for 99% the population. I do want better than YouTube in terms of open and privacy but not if the only possible trade is removing all sense of usability permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) YouTube has been dominating 99% of it's competition by taking 75+% revenues of everyone, analytics, and portfolio shenanigans. It's entirely upto you if you want to deal with a fascist website than dogfood your VOD experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) That just means you're not hosting your own instance&client. It takes me seconds to load on a popular video, at the most popular resolution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) If i have to host my own instance and client to get usable results it's a non starter for 99% the population. I do want better than YouTube in terms of open and privacy but not if the only possible trade is removing all sense of usability permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) YouTube has been dominating 99% of it's competition by taking 75+% revenues of everyone, analytics, and portfolio shenanigans. It's entirely upto you if you want to deal with a fascist website than dogfood your VOD experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) If i have to host my own instance and client to get usable results it's a non starter for 99% the population. I do want better than YouTube in terms of open and privacy but not if the only possible trade is removing all sense of usability permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) YouTube has been dominating 99% of it's competition by taking 75+% revenues of everyone, analytics, and portfolio shenanigans. It's entirely upto you if you want to deal with a fascist website than dogfood your VOD experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) YouTube has been dominating 99% of it's competition by taking 75+% revenues of everyone, analytics, and portfolio shenanigans. It's entirely upto you if you want to deal with a fascist website than dogfood your VOD experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that they aren't basically the antichrist. The problem is we need an actual good solution, just hard line telling people that this is evil so you should put in a shit ton of effort to not using it is just not realistic. It's not going to sway people, i do use nebula and floatplane which i pay for. They have their own problems but they aren't as bad as YouTube but more importantly they are usable. It's very sad that the people that have the skills necessary to actually make something open are always also just so Hardline head up their ass about self hosting everything. I can self-host plenty I have piped, immich, jellyfin, frontend replacements for pixiv, imgur and others as well as my own pastebin. I'm no stranger to self hosting but that doesn't mean that I'm stupid enough to think that it's a viable way to get rid of YouTube it's just not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 1 year ago* The best solution is everyone p2p 3-layer worldwide rountrips of server mirrors, so you get seeded by at the least 3 servers near your ISP. It’s as realistic as TOR already is: by mass volunteering. it’s a viable way to get rid of YouTube it’s just not Logistically, you have you math in reverse: it is precisely the demand for centralization that FashTube is keeping it’s control. If everyone with a computer hosted even 1GB of peertube, we can host our transnational on-Demand superseeders forever, and them some. permalink fedilink source parent