▲ 812 ▼ Jimmy Wales Says Wikipedia Could Use AI. Editors Call It the 'Antithesis of Wikipedia' (www.404media.co) submitted 1 year ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 106 comments fedilink hide all child comments Paywall bypass: https://archive.is/oWcIr
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Flood them with AI-generated applicants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) So why would they accept said AI-generated applicants? If we are making a global system, then confirmation using some nation's ID can be done, with removing fakes found out later. Like with IRL nation states. Or "bring a friend and be responsible if they are a fake". Or both at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Would every participant get to see my government-issued ID? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) One can elect a small group which will and will sign its connection to something intermediate. Then only they will. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do we know if they're doing a good job without being able to review their work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) So why would they accept said AI-generated applicants? If we are making a global system, then confirmation using some nation's ID can be done, with removing fakes found out later. Like with IRL nation states. Or "bring a friend and be responsible if they are a fake". Or both at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Would every participant get to see my government-issued ID? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) One can elect a small group which will and will sign its connection to something intermediate. Then only they will. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do we know if they're doing a good job without being able to review their work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Would every participant get to see my government-issued ID? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) One can elect a small group which will and will sign its connection to something intermediate. Then only they will. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do we know if they're doing a good job without being able to review their work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) One can elect a small group which will and will sign its connection to something intermediate. Then only they will. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do we know if they're doing a good job without being able to review their work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) How do we know if they're doing a good job without being able to review their work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago Well, you will see everyone admitted. Just not their government ID. Or you might make all admissions public, after all, there's difference between pseudonymous admission and pseudonymous action. Blind signatures, ghost keys. One can have public admission, but their actions inside the network will be sufficiently pseudonymous. There are plenty of variants really. permalink fedilink source parent