Ohh! That's a good point! Thanks! I just updated the README to provide an actual description.

Looks like someone did that https://github.com/tldr-pages/tlrc

This is an instance of that recurring trope of coding something better out of pure spite

What your project desperately needs is a description of what it does. I had to follow the links to ethical-tldr back to the original tldr to see what it's supposed to do.

So... C code is faster than python. We knew that. Thanks for the better performing rewrite. Now do it in rust 🤓

Animals in the zoo have "enrichment". I think that'd be fun. When I'm looking for the spreadsheet I'm working on for a meeting, I want to have to hunt around for it everywhere first. Like, if my desktop was Animal Crossing.

Will I find my spreadsheet? Will I find an MP3 from 2003? Will I find nudes from the recycle bin of the janitors home computer?

I don't know! But I know I'll need to look all over for it. That's "enrichment"!

I watched this talk just yesterday. Really interesting and thoughtful design ideas. For anyone who might be disagreeing with the idea on the basis of the title alone, he recognises that the desktop experience has changed since displays have become larger and Microsoft and Apple are no longer innovating. I think this might be why we've found tiling window managers (for example) to be more functional in recent years.

Yeah, why not?

Reinventing the wheel.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

The video, probably.

Having guns isn't inherently a bad thing.

Having guns without the necessary training, certification, and security precautions required to SAFELY own and operate guns is an awful thing.

As witnessed by the relative gun violence statistics of the US and countries with just a modicum of common sense gun laws and regulations.

Thanks for your feedback:)

You keep doing you you funky chicken. Love to see the effort

Alright, so just because a plain text signature is along with content, doesn't mean that the content is signed.
Then how do you check that the content is signed by the plain-text signature given with it?

I thought that the signature means that either a whole copy of the text is encrypted or a hash of the text is encrypted using the private key, which would mean that spoofing the sign would require solving complexity equal to either of:

• Finding another string that gives the same hash
• Finding the private key and signing a new hash with it

What am I missing?

Yeah, GPG is a dumpster fire. It’s security theatre at its finest.

Somewhat reminded of @jonah@neat.computer's general recommendation against GPG (for other reasons than what this talk is about)

That was quite the scroll. Damn.

Google needs to be sued under GLP violation. And some judge with a spine needs to put a billionaire fine to them.

https://github.com/SethRobinson/Patchy#ai-disclosure

Why are people calling this slop? I don't get it.

I'm Lithuanian. It's pretty strict here with guns, really can't compare it with USA and not really sure why you mentioned it.

It's not. But it's gets harder to control them.

even if that is true (I don't know), I don't think it answers the question of why having guns is inherently a bad thing

Which is ALSO a good thing, obviously :)