[–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

I flashed it to /dev/sda (my USB) and not a partition in DD, so that can't be it. If it matters, I used a block size of 1M the second time and didn't specify the first time. Something I have observed is with a few Linux installers in the past is that sometimes when the boot gets stuck I have to unplug and replug the USB for it to detect it and finish booting. Maybe that's related?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Under normal circumstances, yes, the installer should start on its own.

    My first thought is, as I've seen quite a few people do this on Mastodon (and I've done this myself once by accident!), if you had flashed it to a partition rather than the whole disk? (i.e. on Linux flashing to /dev/sdb1 rather than /dev/sdb)

    I've also flashed amd64 install media for a machine that would run the i386 port of NetBSD, so pmjv's question is also worth looking into.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Already symtartibg to see NetBSD 11 entries on NYC*BUG dmesgd

    Launched in 2004, dmesgd aims to provide a user-submitted repository of searchable *BSD dmesgs. The dmesg(8) command displays the system message buffer's content, and during boot a copy is saved to /var/run/dmesg.boot. This buffer contains the operating system release, name and version, a list of devices identified, plus a whole host of other useful information. We hope others find this resource useful and further contribute to its growth. Contact us at [ admin at lists dot nycbug dot org ]. Note that this site is not a substitute for sending the dmesg directly to the respective project. 

    Submit your dmesg here:

    https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/dmesgd?do=submit

    And if a handy script is what you are looking for, this Perl script from AFresh1 has long been the go-to for many submitters:

    https://gist.github.com/afresh1/99cdd481184147f0e8c0

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Nice Article, but to me, NetBSD is not '90s' like. It and the other BSDs went down a different path than Linux, or actually stayed on the same path. Instead of going down a Windows Path, they stayed on a UNIX path.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    In general, the bootstrap relies on a binary package of the previous version. This is unacceptable for an otherwise source-only, self-contained distribution like the NetBSD sources.

    But how is C different in this regard?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    Nice article, and yes, I agree with cgd(8) and the installer :)

    I was able to setup cgd(8) but that was not easy. I had tp print out that chapter and scribble some notes for install on a 2nd device. But as another article said, you get a great sense of accomplishment once you get NetBSD up and running !

  • source