Computer science, computer engineering, electrical engineering?

Most R&D is funded by business, because it's expensive. Nobody really says "yes, let's spend millions of dollars to possibly make a retail product with poor margins".

they were eyewitness accounts

who gives eyewitness if they BELIEVE it has happened?

eyewitness can only be given if you have seen it happen with your very own eyes

that was just a summary image

Rofl

They're proof that people believed a thing happened. Its not proof the thing happened. Im not saying the letters are forgery, simply they don't suffice as proof. Why haven't they showed up in 4k to make the non-believers shut up and save them from hell?

Ddg tells me that catholic hosts refers to communion wafers. Are you saying that there's cardiac tissue in communion? What source do you have for that claim? Can I genome sequence or clone Jesus then?

back then, they didnt have 4k resolution footage, so letters and archeological and literary sources are the some of the best proof we can get.

also, back then, ink, a writing station, a quill were expensive and it was extremely hard to forge writing

and alive human cardiac tissue was found growing on hosts in a catholic church

People can be tricked is a simpler explanation. Magicians have entire shows where they trick the perceptions of hundreds to thousands every night. Letters and witnesses could just as easily be justified as aliens rather than god.

No idea what you mean about "alive cardiac tissue on catholic hosts".

Presupposing the result is not an argument

can you provide proof for your "fact"?

there is a lot of proof, you have a choice to either listen and then have a conversation or to plug your ears and go lalalalalallalaala

I think the latter isnt very scientific

He is omnipotent and he created the universe. it would be pretty illogical to think the creator must conform to creation?

Not opinion.

Fact.

Wake up.

plenty of proof for the sun being the center of the solar system

No, definitely not.

Not opinion.

Fact.

Wake up.

plenty of proof for God.

No, definitely not. You're an idiot. Now, get lost.

That is just assigning God special properties and then claiming done.

Again, an opinion, and an utterly wrong one at that.

there is plenty of proof for God,

try to be more open minded

Ha. Loser.

You don't need science to know there are no "gods". Just need to stop being a gullible moron.

This question reminded me of James Burke's documentaries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Burke_(science_historian)

that kindof a weird way to write in a thread/forum based system.

I try to write in columns but lemmy doesnt include all the spaces

thank you for the response, but i think it needs a little punctuation.

multiple letters to and from roman officials about the resurrection 500+ witnesses empty tomb alive cardiac tissue growing on catholic hosts

please elaborate.

God is omnipotent, so he exists on a completely different level than the universe apples to oranges