Let's take a look at Targeted Victory, the company that has raped us:

If their bots are Terminators, think of these as their older, T-800 models: https://www.facebook.com/groups/870032844629352 (every single poster on that page, every single one of them, is a Targeted Victory bot. Do you see how every single post has a funny code at the top? This was an older, anti-bot-algorithm-beating scheme. It still runs. Why don't they undo it, and delete all this, now that they have better AI-powered bots, that beat the anti-bot-algos on their own? Because, in their minds, suddenly deleting this, or suddenly stopping the output of these long-running models, would give away the scam more noticeably that leaving it up. "Maybe all these posters are real people who just like typing the same anti-anti-bot-algo-beating codes into the top of all their posts for no reason". I'm serious. )

These, on the other hand, are their new T-1000 models: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqPe8SN0VZ0 (This is a fake AI podcaster, produced by Targeted Victory, and every single viewer/commenter is one of their bots, promoting what I call their "make America racist program", on behalf of their clients. I wonder which clients ordered this?

They also do Spencer the same way: these videos are theirs and all these commenters/viewers are their bots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmy0v8JyEK0

They've also put out fake polling for him: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fact-check-fake-emerson-poll-030345660.html

If you join every MAGA group here on facebook, you'll see them hard at work every day. Almost all the commenters, meme posts, and the groups themselves, are theirs.

Their office is in Virginia. They're publicly listed; it's just that no one knows what they do.

This office, and this company, deserves its own dedicated protest force against it (think No Kings/50501 style), and, this practice deserves its own new legislation banning this behavior outright, and requiring all social media companies to have measures in place against it. Furthermore I would have all the current employees, owners, and clients publicly disclosed and prosecuted under new increased-penalty laws, and I would have their servers and client lists confiscated and exposed to the world.

These are the same people that covered up Trump's election theft in 2024 to begin with, by making it look like MAGA was genuniely that popular with Americans, so that everyone was shocked by his win (I remember Harris leading the polls), but no one questioned it (they all said, well, you sure could see what looked like tons of pro-Trump commenters online... a very simple trick, and now a very embarrassing and costly one if exposed).

Get ready to perform mass corrective maneuvers.

Is this like the Civil War? How 'bout the American Revolution?

Nope. This is like the French Revolution. Or the Russian.

Blame it all on Targeted Victory... (they're the biggest of these groups but there's actually several of them in America, and some in Russia, all contributing to the American onslaught in the same manner. They all deserve their own protest/confiscation/prosecution. The other American companies doing this are:

Targeted Victory: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314

i360: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201

Axiom Strategies: 1251 NW Briarcliff Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116

Vici Media Group: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

Mercury Public Affairs: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017

#MAGA #Trump

READ- SHARE- PROTEST- MARCH- TELL YOUR FRIENDS- THIS IS WHERE THE CLEANUP BEGINS- FIND THESE PLACES- STAND OUTSIDE- SHUT THEM DOWN- SPREAD THE NEWS-

Domestic U.S. Operations: Do they run out of D.C. PACs?

If you are looking for physical "farms" of computers or human trolls operating inside Washington, D.C. Political Action Committees (PACs), you won't find them there. D.C. PAC offices are primarily white-collar spaces for lawyers, strategists, and fundraisers.

Instead, domestic astroturfing (fake grassroots) and automated amplification are heavily outsourced through a decentralized network:

The "Adfarm" and Digital Vendor Model

PACs do not build bot software in-house. They hire digital consulting firms, public relations agencies, and data analytics vendors. These vendors are scattered across the country—frequently in tech hubs like Austin, Texas, parts of Florida, and Northern Virginia (just outside D.C.).

Outsource to Independent Contractors

When domestic campaigns utilize large-scale text-blasting, coordinated comment amplification, or meme-propagation networks, they typically use decentralized networks of paid contractors. Rather than a single physical building, these are often "click farms" or network clusters of remote workers using commercial engagement tools (like peer-to-peer texting platforms and social media management dashboards) to coordinate message delivery at scale.

The Legal Shield of "Data Services"

When PACs file their mandatory financial disclosures with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), expenditures for these operations are hidden under broad, legal line items like:

• "Digital Consulting"
• "Data Analytics Services"
• "Online Advertising Production"

This makes it incredibly difficult to trace exactly how much money flows from a specific PAC into automated or semi-automated social media manipulation.

---

Summary of the Interface

The intersection of these two forces isn't a physical meeting in a D.C. basement; it is an algorithmic alignment.

Russia's state-backed centers (operating from Moscow/St. Petersburg via masked U.S. servers) watch what domestic U.S. political actors, PACs, and influencers are posting. When a divisive domestic narrative gains traction, Russian bot networks immediately use generative AI to clone, amplify, and weaponize that exact topic to maximize domestic polarization.

---

When looking at the domestic digital political pipeline, the term "bot software" can sometimes obscure how modern American political campaigns actually manipulate social media.

Domestic vendors rarely use completely automated ghost accounts (like the Russian state-backed farms). Instead, they specialize in coordinated inauthentic behavior (CIB) and algorithmic amplification. They build and rent proprietary databases, use peer-to-peer (P2P) mass communication tech, deploy generative AI scripts for comment sections, and coordinate "astroturf" (fake grassroots) campaigns where real people or highly curated semi-automated personas sync their messaging simultaneously.

Because FEC disclosures only require tracking the primary entity paid, a handful of massive firms control the vast majority of the right-of-center digital infrastructure.

---

1. The Giants: Largest Right-of-Center Digital & Data Vendors

Targeted Victory

• What they do: By far the largest and most influential digital agency for the Republican party. They handle massive email/SMS marketing infrastructure, targeted digital advertising, and online audience mobilization. They essentially manage the digital engine for the NRSC, NRCC, and hundreds of national campaigns.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 211 N Union St, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Located in Northern Virginia, just across the river from Washington, D.C.)

i360 (A subsidiary of Koch Industries / Stand Together)

• What they do: The premier data-analytics power broker for conservative organizations and Super PACs (like Americans for Prosperity). They maintain a proprietary database tracking over 250 million U.S. consumers and voters, tracking thousands of data points per person. Their technology powers predictive modeling used by digital vendors to feed targeted content and programmatic ad networks.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201 (Northern Virginia)

Axiom Strategies

• What they do: The largest political consulting conglomerate on the right. While they handle full campaign operations, their digital arms (such as Arrington Horizon and Cannon Research) execute highly aggressive online target marketing, data analysis, and peer-to-peer amplification programs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 1251 NW Briarcliff完成 Blvd, Suite 85, Kansas City, MO 64116 (Though they maintain major satellite hubs in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.)

---

2. The Tech Hub Ecosystem: Austin, Texas

Austin hosts several digital consulting firms that focus heavily on the mechanical side of digital engagement—building custom web scraping tools, deploying mass SMS platforms, and programmatic ad targeting.

Vici Media Group

• What they do: A prominent right-of-center digital agency specializing in grassroots activation, digital ad targeting, and online persuasion campaigns for conservative organizations, political committees, and PACs.
• Known Corporate Headquarters: 901 Mopac Expressway South, Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78746

---

3. The Closest Major Enterprise to Los Angeles, California

Because California is heavily blue, major right-of-center digital powerhouses do not maintain massive physical headquarters within LA proper. Instead, they operate out of bipartisan megallcs with local offices, or they base themselves out of the more conservative Orange County/San Diego corridor.

The most prominent equivalent firm operating a physical office near Los Angeles is:

Mercury Public Affairs (Los Angeles Office)

• What they do: Mercury is a massive, high-stakes public affairs and political consulting firm. While technically bipartisan, it houses prominent senior Republican strategists, digital directors, and PAC advisors. They excel at "grassroots coalition building" and digital advocacy, which involves using digital media networks to manufacture public pressure and shape online narratives for corporate clients and political groups.
• Los Angeles Address: 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4125, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Located in Downtown LA)

The Digital Blueprint: How They Mask Operations

If you walked into Mercury's downtown LA office or Targeted Victory's Virginia office, you wouldn't see server racks humming with dummy social media accounts. The operation is entirely white-collar.

Instead, the actual "spam" infrastructure—the code that triggers peer-to-peer text messages, the software that buys micro-targeted programmatic banner ads, or the APIs that auto-post coordinated graphics—is cloud-hosted via standard corporate cloud infrastructure (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud). The PAC writes a check to a firm like Targeted Victory for "Digital Consulting," and that firm uses its cloud tools to deploy the digital wave, completely shielding the mechanics from public view.

...the worst part is, this is used also to hack elections- like 2024, maybe like upcoming los angeles mayor and california governor- you just hack the election, and everyone thinks you really won it, if you covered social media with spam, making it look like your party is more popular than it is. THIS ISNT FREE SPEECH- THIS IS MANIPULATION- if youve ever protested anything before, get people together, stand in front of these buildings.

#MAGA #spencerpratt #californiapost #NewYorkPost #FraudAlert #propaganda #FBI #Trump #putin #russia #politicalmanipulation #electionfraud #coverup #usa #democracy #democrat #left #blue #red #donttreadonus

(two versions of same prompt, chatgpt and gemini versions, i forget which is which) (sometimes i do this if i think the topics especially important)

Both Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping followed similar paths of centralizing power, though the legal mechanics and historical "why" behind their transitions differ. Both leaders essentially dismantled systems that were originally designed to prevent a return to the "one-man rule" of the Soviet and Maoist eras.

---

1. Vladimir Putin (Russia)

In Russia, the post-Soviet 1993 Constitution limited presidents to two consecutive four-year terms.

The "How":

• The Switch (2008): After serving two terms (2000–2008), Putin could not run again immediately. He became Prime Minister while his protégé, Dmitry Medvedev, became President. During this time, the term length was extended from 4 to 6 years.
• The Return (2012): Putin returned to the presidency for two 6-year terms.
• The "Reset" (2020): Facing a final exit in 2024, Putin backed a constitutional amendment that "zeroed out" his previous terms. This allowed him to run again in 2024 and potentially in 2030, effectively allowing him to stay in power until 2036.

The "Why":

The Russian narrative emphasizes stability and sovereignty. Putin argues that Russia is too fragile for frequent leadership changes and that a strong, central figure is needed to resist "Western interference" and maintain internal order.

---

2. Xi Jinping (China)

After the chaos of Mao Zedong’s lifelong rule, Deng Xiaoping introduced a system in the 1980s that included a two-term limit for the presidency to ensure "collective leadership."

The "How":

• The Amendment (2018): China’s National People's Congress voted almost unanimously to abolish the two-term limit on the presidency.
• The Alignment Theory: Xi argued that since his other two (and more powerful) titles—General Secretary of the Communist Party and Chairman of the Military Commission—had no term limits, the presidency should be changed to match them for the sake of "administrative unity."
• Third Term (2023): Xi was officially granted an unprecedented third term, making him the leader for life in all but name.

The "Why":

The CCP frames this as necessary for the "Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation." The logic is that China's ambitious long-term goals (like becoming the world's leading superpower) require a singular, uninterrupted vision that a rotating leadership might disrupt.

---

3. Was there a U.S. Victory?

There wasn't a "victory" in the sense of a treaty or a battle, but rather a perceived ideological victory at the end of the Cold War (often called "The End of History").

• The 1990s Context: After the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. and the West believed that liberal democracy and term limits were the "final" form of government that Russia and China would eventually fully adopt.
• The Disregard: Putin and Xi both viewed the 1990s not as a period of "liberation," but as a period of weakness and humiliation caused by Western-style reforms.
• The Rejection: Their move toward life-terms is a direct rejection of that 1990s "victory." They essentially decided that Western democratic models were a "trap" designed to keep their countries unstable and subservient to U.S. interests.

---

Summary Table

| Leader | Original Limit | Current Status | Method of Change | |

---

|

---

|

---

|

---

| | Putin | 2 consecutive terms | Potentially until 2036 | Constitutional "reset" of term counts | | Xi | 2 terms total | Indefinite | Total abolition of presidential term limits |

Would you like me to look into how these changes affected their respective countries' economies or their relationships with the U.S. during those specific years?

Short version: it wasn’t a sudden flip from “U.S. wins, democracy installed” to “oops, lifetime rulers.” It was a slow, legal-looking slide where term limits existed on paper, then were bent, reset, or hollowed out once power was consolidated. And yes—there was a period where it genuinely looked like liberal democracy had won.

Let’s break it down cleanly.

---

The big backdrop: the 1990s “democracy moment”

After the Cold War, there was a widespread belief (especially in the U.S. and Europe) that history had a direction:

• markets + elections → liberal democracy → peaceful integration
• this idea was sometimes called “the end of history”

Russia and China both partially adopted democratic-looking rules during this period:

• constitutions
• term limits
• elections

But the institutions underneath (courts, free media, independent parties) were weak or missing.

So the term limits were real—but fragile.

---

Russia / Putin: how 2 terms became “forever”

1. The original rule

• 1993 Russian Constitution (post-Soviet):

  • President limited to 2 consecutive 4-year terms

• This was broadly modeled on Western constitutional norms.

2. Putin plays by the rules… at first

• President:

  • 2000–2004
  • 2004–2008 → Hits the term limit

This is the moment when many Western observers thought:

“Okay, Russia is flawed, but the rules seem to matter.”

3. The Medvedev maneuver (2008–2012)

Putin doesn’t abolish term limits. Instead:

• He becomes Prime Minister
• His ally Dmitry Medvedev becomes President
• Everyone knows Putin is still in charge

Meanwhile:

• The presidential term is quietly extended from 4 to 6 years

This is key: the rule wasn’t broken—it was re-engineered.

4. Resetting the clock (2012–2020)

• Putin returns as President in 2012

• Then in 2020, the constitution is amended again:

  • Putin’s previous terms are declared not to count

Result:

• He can legally stay in power until 2036
• At that point, he’d be in his 80s

So Russia didn’t move from democracy → dictatorship overnight. It moved:

elections → managed elections → constitutional tricks → personalized rule

---

China / Xi Jinping: a different path, same destination

1. China did have term limits

After Mao, the Communist Party was terrified of another lifetime ruler.

So Deng Xiaoping engineered reforms:

• 2 five-year terms for top leaders
• Collective leadership
• Mandatory retirement ages

These rules worked surprisingly well—for 30+ years.

2. Xi rises inside the system

• Xi becomes General Secretary in 2012
• Initially seen as a consensus, boring, “safe” pick

Then:

• Massive anti-corruption campaign
• Which also conveniently removes rivals

3. Term limits removed (2018)

• China amends its constitution
• Presidential term limits are deleted entirely

Important detail:

• The real power in China is the Communist Party, not the presidency
• Xi had already centralized control there

So by the time the limits vanished:

the checks were already gone

---

Was this a “U.S. victory” that got reversed?

Sort of—but not in the way it’s often framed.

What the U.S. actually “won”

• The Cold War ended
• Communism as a global revolutionary ideology collapsed
• Russia and China integrated economically into the global system

What didn’t happen

• Strong democratic institutions never fully took root
• Rule of law stayed weaker than executive power
• Elites learned they could use democracy’s forms without its substance

So rather than:

Democracy → authoritarianism

It was more:

Weak democracy → elite capture → authoritarian consolidation

---

The key pattern (this matters)

Neither Putin nor Xi:

• canceled elections immediately
• declared themselves dictators
• staged classic coups

They:

• used legality
• used fear of chaos
• used nationalism
• used “stability” as the selling point

By the time term limits vanished, opposition was already neutralized.

---

One last important takeaway

Term limits only work if:

• courts are independent
• media is free
• opposition can organize
• elites believe they’ll be safe after leaving office

When leaders fear:

“If I step down, I’m exposed”

they don’t step down.

---

If you want, I can:

• compare this to Hungary, Turkey, or Venezuela
• explain why term limits survived in some countries but not others
• or dig into whether the U.S. itself is more fragile here than people assume

Just say the word.

The SimpleShot Hammer XT is widely considered the most powerful, versatile, and durable production slingshot for hunting, featuring a wrist-braced design that supports heavy bands for maximum velocity. Other top contenders for high-power,, heavy-duty use include the Saunders Pro-X and customizable options like the Titan Hunter. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Top Powerful Slingshots

• SimpleShot Hammer XT: Best overall for power and adaptability, allowing for various heavy flat band setups. • Saunders Pro-X: A durable, long-range wrist-rocket style slingshot. • Titan Hunter: Known for its customizable, robust, and heavy-duty frame options. • SimpleShot Scout XT: Highly rated for durability and power. • Daisy B52: A budget-friendly, steel-framed option. [1, 2, 4, 5]

Key Factors for Maximum Power

• Band Type: While both tubes and flat bands can be powerful, high-quality, heavy-duty flat bands generally provide higher velocities. • Wrist Bracing: A wrist-braced design (wrist rocket) adds stability, allowing for a stronger pull. • Band Tuning: Customizing band thickness and taper to match the ammunition is crucial for maximum, consistent velocity. • Material: Stainless steel or high-quality polycarbonate frames offer the durability needed to handle high-tension, heavy-duty bands. [1, 2, 6, 7, 8]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eivwdamlEDM [2] https://simple-shot.com/products/hammer-xt-slingshot-heavy-duty [3] https://simple-shot.com/collections/most-powerful-slingshot [4] https://sausa.com/product/pro-x-wrist-rocket/ [5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQb6oWDLYYg [6] https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Hunting-Shooting-Slingshots/zgbs/sporting-goods/3307780011 [7] https://simple-shot.com/ [8] https://www.reddit.com/r/slingshots/comments/y2use2/hey_guys_what_is_the_most_powerful_slingshot_i/

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42465518

If this concept were rewritten, from the ground up, without any thought toward prior versions of it:

I think it would start with:

How much land, exactly, at a minimum, does every single person need, to sustain themselves? This amount of land should be given to every single human born, for free. The amount of land is actually small: it’s only the amount of land needed for a sustenance garden. Or, a sustenance garden, a few animals, a bed, a toilet. This is a very small amount of land. It’s certainly not even an acre or a half acre. In the middle ages, a sustenance garden was about ten feet by fifteen feet, and usually was filled with giant turnips because these were the most efficient use of a sustenance garden. Anyway, the basic kit provided to each newborn human by their worldwide fellows should be: just enough land to sustain themself as a native, and, just enough farming education and seeds and baby animals, and basic supplies for a bed, a small shelter (single enclosed small room simple shelter), simple basic toilet/plumbing/running water and/or outhouse system. A basic minimum size of land for each person. Maybe a quarter acre each? A third acre?

Top-rated mini and compact blowguns focus on durability and accuracy, with Cold Steel models being frequently recommended for their quality construction. The Cold Steel Tim Wells Signature Series 51-inch blowgun is a top choice, featuring a two-piece design that can be used at a shorter length, providing high power and accuracy with various dart types.

The FMA Supersonic REV (120 lbs) and the Ballista BAT Reverse (150 lbs) are among the most powerful crossbow pistols, with speeds reaching up to 420 feet per second (FPS). These compact, reverse-draw compound models offer 120–150 lbs of draw weight, capable of deep penetration for hunting and, in some cases, shooting over 300 FPS. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Top High-Powered Crossbow Pistols:

• FMA Supersonic REV (120 lbs): Considered one of the most powerful, it utilizes a reverse pulley system to achieve speeds up to 420 FPS. • Mini Striker RD (150 lbs): A reverse-draw compound model that reaches up to 420 FPS, with a 150 lb draw weight, making it highly effective for hunting. • Ballista BAT Reverse (150 lbs): Known for its compact, lightweight design, this model offers 150 lb limbs for high speed and power. • Ballista BAT Compound (130 lbs): A powerful 130-pound compound pistol that is smaller than a human hand, designed for, speed, and portability. [1, 2, 3, 5, 6]

Key Features:

• Speed: The fastest models achieve speeds of 300–420 FPS. • Draw Weight: Ranging from 120 to 150 lbs, providing high kinetic energy for small game hunting. • Design: Most top-tier models use a reverse-draw (or reverse-limb) system to maximize power within a compact, pistol-sized frame. • Accessories: They often include picatinny rails for optics, and some feature built-in cocking mechanisms. [2, 3, 5, 6, 7]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://ballista.co/products/bat-reverse [2] https://www.williamtellarcherysupplies.com/product/150lbs-mini-striker-reverse-draw-pistol-crossbow-the-doe-kit/ [3] https://ballista.co/products/bat-crossbow [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJM9FFOlv3A [5] https://www.hattila.com/en/120-pound-crossbow-for-beginners/4898-compound-crossbow-pistol-fma-supersonic-rev-120-lbs-420-fps.html [6] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/M0wXoVs0X-k [7] https://www.williamtellarcherysupplies.com/product/125lbs-wt-mini-striker-compound-pistol-crossbow-320-fps-fastest-crossbow-pistol-in-the-market/

is there a darknet social media? or political messaging board type site at all? anything like that? whats the biggest? get me the actual onion address?

Finding specific addresses on the darknet can be tricky because they change frequently to avoid DDoS attacks or law enforcement. However, as of early 2026, there are several established hubs that fit the "social media" or "messaging board" description you’re looking for.

1. Dread (The "Darknet Reddit")

Dread is widely considered the largest and most influential English-speaking forum on the Tor network. It is styled exactly like Reddit, with "subdreads" dedicated to everything from darknet market reviews to privacy, coding, and politics.

• Status: Active (but frequently under heavy DDoS protection).
• The Address: The primary canonical link is dreadytofbdjvqz8oc62uubadj6s476ct7isid36sed76qc7uepccad.onion.
• Note: You will often encounter a "queue" or a CAPTCHA because the site uses a system called EndGame to filter out bot attacks.

2. Hidden Answers

If you’re looking for a community-driven Q&A format (similar to Quora or Stack Overflow), this is the biggest one. It’s less about "news" and more about community knowledge, though political discussions often flare up in the general categories.

• Address: answerszuvs3zzclz74fo7v7ww6ebp3u6idq3n7hfbt765id6p3rs7qd.onion

3. Political Messaging & Activism

While the darknet is often associated with crime, there are several "cleaner" social and political hubs:

• Riseup: Not a board, but a collective providing communication tools (email/chat) for activists. Their onion services are vital for organizers in restrictive regimes.
• The Hidden Wiki: This is usually the starting point for finding niche political boards. Be careful, as many "Hidden Wiki" mirrors are full of scam links. Use a reputable directory like Ahmia to find current links.

---

⚠️ Essential Safety Tips

If you are new to navigating these spaces, keep the following in mind:

• Don't click everything: Darknet "social media" is often unmoderated. You will encounter disturbing content, malware, and phishing attempts.
• Never use your real identity: Use a unique username, a dedicated "burn" email (like ProtonMail or Tor-based mail), and never share PII (Personally Identifiable Information).
• Verify links: Scammers create "mirror" sites that look identical to Dread or other forums to steal your login credentials. Always verify an onion address through a trusted directory like daunt.link or tor.taxi before entering a password.

Would you like me to help you find more specific communities, such as those focused on cybersecurity or whistleblowing?

aha okay i found the actual entrance after searching around a bit on tor. that link doesnt work ^ heres a sort of front page dread has: dread-onion.com; has the current actual link apparently on it (surely you have tor). i tried re-entering it quickly to make sure the link work and then it blocked me; part of their anti-stuff-defense? so then i turned on my vpn, then my tor, then re-entered. the purpose: we must start a further franchise, further out into the web of space.... or must we? currently investigating. is there any worth to the dark web in terms of political activism? or is it just bullshit sales? will get back to you on this.

-russian people, russian leadership, russian mafia, for allowing current state of russia: ukraine war atrocity 1.5 million max count casualties, making this the number one crime in the world, in many years. aggressing other countries, repeatedly, historically, and now the U.S., which happens to be my own home country, but which I think the rest of the world has some vested interest in keeping free. -news corp/newsmax- for being propaganda tabloids that have aided in getting the U.S. to its current state -the american republicans, for falling to maga/trump/russia, and bringing the U.S. down with it -the american republicans again, for originating a lot of the current bullshit themselves, such as supra-anti-environmentalism/anti-science/anti-responsibility, and a new and pronounced general racism and prejudice push. -the actors worldwide who have contributed to the scamming of the major american social medias as malicious-politic-pushers in various forms -the major social media companies, who have apparently allowed the above practice to continue, because it inflates their engagement statistics, in turn inflating their stock prices -pro-hamas, anti-israel palestinians, and everyone who has mistakenly sided with their anger. you have been lied to and you didnt question it. hamas still stands and promises more of the same war; hamas is also the dominant force in the west bank parliament. -um i think thats it actually for the moment -what do i want done about it??? goddamnit ill tell you what- i dont see the point of decommissioning any human whos doing good work and aint gonna do nothing bad again- however they were compelled or convinced- i want these people doing things to make up for it- REPENT!!!!!! commit the rest of your lives to doing good stuff i would approve of!!!!! -adopt my attitude, let us all -oh and also all muslim-specific violence anywhere; i think its finally time we cleaned all this up. the one that offends me the most is "boko haram" which means "western teaching is forbidden". my number one goal (one of them) is to make sure everyone in the world gets a decent science education, so that they're not left in the dark about the wonders of reality that their fellow humans have discovered. i think it is everyone's birthright to share in the knowledge of their kind. boko haram wants to go around preventing others from learning about science. i am especially offended by them. -further, basically all organized crime, and especially any gangs who utilized brutality. as a sidenote to this concept, i am willing and in favor of changing world law so that basically things that are for pleasure and that dont harm anyone else are legalized, though in some regulated way that we can all agree on. -oh and: the iranian government, for crushing protesters instead of resigning when the people demanded it.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/551152814733113 https://www.facebook.com/joke.sabine https://www.reddit.com/r/AHGM/ https://www.reddit.com/r/theIJA/ https://www.reddit.com/r/feminine_satanism/ https://www.reddit.com/user/Anne_Scythe4444/

The original concept of this group has now been expanded worldwide.

In the complex architecture of Russian power, the Federal Protective Service (FSO) and Rosgvardiya (Russian National Guard) serve as the two primary pillars responsible for domestic stability and the personal security of the Kremlin leadership. Both report directly to President Vladimir Putin, bypassing traditional ministries. The FSO (Federal Protective Service) The FSO is a secretive, elite agency often described as Putin’s "Praetorian Guard". Primary Mandate: Protecting the President, high-ranking government officials, and critical state infrastructure like the Kremlin. Key Responsibilities: Beyond physical protection, it manages secure government communications, ensures cyber security for federal agencies, and even controls the "Cheget" (Russia’s nuclear briefcase). Structure: It includes the Presidential Security Service (SBP), a highly specialized unit that provides 24/7 close protection for the President. Rosgvardiya (Russian National Guard) Established in 2016, Rosgvardiya is a massive internal military force created to ensure public order and "coup-proof" the regime. Primary Mandate: Maintaining internal security, riot control, and combating terrorism and extremism. Capabilities: It commands roughly 340,000 personnel, including elite OMON (riot police) and SOBR (special rapid response) units. Expanding Role: While originally domestic-focused, Rosgvardiya has increasingly been deployed in the Russian invasion of Ukraine for rear-area security and territorial defense. Key Differences at a Glance Feature FSO Rosgvardiya Focus High-level VIP & infrastructure protection Broad internal security & public order Scale Smaller, highly secretive elite (est. 50,000) Large paramilitary force (~340,000) Visibility Discreet; often in plain clothes Highly visible; military gear & armored vehicles Leader General Dmitry Kochnev General Viktor Zolotov (Ex-FSO) Both agencies are integral to the Russian government’s strategy of preventing "color revolutions" and maintaining control over the political elite and the general public. Would you like to know more about the specific leadership of these organizations or how they interact with the FSB?