[–] 13 points 6 months ago (7 children)

it's not a mistake, it's marketing. the people in charge of tech companies don't want people to understand the difference between AI and LLMs, because it makes their product seem more impressive and valuable than it really is

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    It's Pattern Matching — Not Understanding

    ... anyone who falls into this trap is welcome to study the very latest we know about human consciousness.

    The awakening is brutal. There's not a single thing in science pointing to us being anything more than pattern matching machines ourselves ...

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    If these AI agents are half as good as their marketing says they are, why would you need to buy any software licenses at all? Just have the AI write any software you need for you.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    If they actually have "mythos" Which can hack bank, server etc. They won't be bragging about it online they would have already sold it to the government to hack adversary countries infrastructure like Russia and China.

    Bottom line "its bullshit"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    "Vulnerability research is cooked." If all that was protecting some subsystem was a lack of attention, well, we've now automated that attention.

    Bigass datacenter models are maybe one year ahead of local offline laptop fare. Recently it's been more like six months. The optimistic view is that we're topping out the sigmoid curve for what LLMs can do... the pessimistic counterpoint is that the full power and threat of LLMs will be achieved real fuckin' soon. They're already smarter than a script kiddie.

    Anthropic will not immediately release Mythos Preview to the public, having determined that doing so without more robust safeguards would be too dangerous.

    All safeguards can be automatically removed via "abliteration." There's a script that mixes mundane questions and evil questions to identify the don't-answer-this vector and simply negate it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Firing a couple of nuclear missles to discourage the enemy from continued warfare is a great idea.

    👉 It is right to the point, conveys your intensions clearly.

    🤜 Demonstrates your capabilities to the enemy harshly but fairly (by only firing a couple of missiles).

    ✍️ Guaranteed to end in a ceasefire deal which is beneficial for civilians in both countries.

    👏 Alies and enemies alike will have a heightened sense of respect for you for years to come.

    ✅ Will provide valuable testing and validation data for your nuclear warfare tech.

    Overall it is a huge win for both sides.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    the analogy to molecules seems really far fetched but not an expert so... Also so because it came in a time when protein folding was quite popularized by AlphaFold's success. But I guess time will tell if it has any substance or not.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›