[–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

After looking into it quite a bit myself, the ones that seem most promising are Mailbox, Posteo, Tuta and Fastmail. I've tried all of them except for Mailbox and they're all pretty solid options.

Each have their selling points, so I would recommend taking a quick look at all of them before deciding. Posteo for example is really cheap unless you need loads of extra aliases and storage, but does not support custom domains. Tuta does not support third party clients. Fastmail is kinda expensive, but gives you more storage than the others and some extra features. Mailbox seems really similar to Posteo to me in a lot of ways, but has more features in their more expensive plans.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    For you it wouldn't really matter much. It is a big improvement and very much noticeable, but it matters much more for people like me that only runs Steam when I'm about to play a game through it which can happen several times a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 54 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It didn't really bother me before, but it has been kind of slow to start for a long time. Bad enough for me to notice that's it's slow, but not bad enough to feel the need to complain about it.

    Now it only takes about 6 seconds for me which is perfectly fine. As someone who only runs Steam when I'm about to play a game through it, it's a very noticeable improvement!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    I completely agree that Nvidia is one of the least consumer-friendly companies, but for a long time they have simply offered the better features like DLSS and RT efficiency. And depending on the tier of card you're buying, that is also the case in terms of raw performance, even now.

    AMD and Intel also has their share of shitty practices, so it's not like you either buy from "the good guys" or "the bad guys". They're all corporations that would, and do, happily screw you over if it means more money.

    I agree though. While there are some valid reasons for buying an Nvidia GPU, a lot of people keep buying them simply because they're used to it or that they're already popular. If something like the 9070 XT, or any weaker cards, would meet your needs then you should seriously consider looking elsewhere than Nvidia.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I didn't mean it in a philosophical or ethical sense. Yes, their formal W11 requirements are stupid, but you can literally ignore them.

    Some of the requirements are just there on paper and the installer will let you continue regardless. And the rest can be disabled by flashing the ISO with Rufus and toggling that option on. Yes, this risks you not getting updates in the future and may affect certain (not very important) functions, but you absolutely can ignore the requirements if you want to, and as far as I know no one has been denied support so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Of course there is. It's compatible with almost any software and hardware (if you ignore their arbitrary W11 "requirements" which you can in most cases) that you can get your hands on. Microsoft and Windows deserve most of the flack they're getting, but we should be honest.

    Take Linux as a comparison. Compatibility is pretty good nowadays and is only getting better, especially with all the work going into Proton from both Valve and the community. But certain things are simply not supported which can make it either difficult or straight up impossible to get to work. Not that Linux is to blame for that, of course, but it is reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I wonder what makes this different or better compared to something like Amethyst. I haven't really gotten around to trying the latter either yet, but that's the one I keep hearing about.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I also think the name "Early Access" is misleading. You're really paying to become a beta/alpha tester which also includes a license to the full release when/if that happens. If that is what you want, then that's fine, and the product page always details the current state and plans, but I still think it's a tiny bit problematic.

    Personally I ignore most Early Access games altogether and only buy if the price clearly makes sense for what the game offers at that moment and that seems pretty rare.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    CachyOS is also great for gaming, but calling it "a gaming distro" is underselling it for people who do not care much for gaming. It's a highly optimized general-use distro that is also great for gaming.

    But by default it does not install any gaming-related packages, so calling it a gaming distro is wrong. It has a shortcut to install everything most people would want for gaming, and the team also tunes it in ways that benefits gaming, and they also have their own Proton fork called Proton-CachyOS that is in my opinion the best one. Right now it is still based on a relatively old Experimental version because the main dev behind it is taking a break, but it's normally very up-to-date on everything including new features and fixes.

    Plenty of people do not want the "bloat" that actual gaming distros include by default and CachyOS is the best of both worlds. Pretty clean by default, with easy access to gaming tools if you want that.

  • source
  •  

    Being in the process of switching over to Linux from Windows, I've found most things work incredibly well and the things that don't mostly have native alternatives or runs well through something like Proton, Lutris or Bottles. But the one thing that is currently making me keep Windows around and regularly using it is color management and monitor profiling software, and I would really appreciate any suggestions.

    This is, in my case, about KDE Plasma on CachyOS/Arch with an Nvidia GPU and I've spent some time trying to figure it out since the Wayland color management/HDR protocol was finalized some months ago, but have not had much luck. Plasma seems to have decent support for using ICC profiles in newer versions, but creating them in the first place is a challenge. I've tried a few things, but none of them give good results. First off I've tried running DisplayCAL as you normally would, and while it connects to my calibrator (X-Rite i1 Display Pro Plus) and gets through most of the process it fails at the very end before it would normally ask you to save and install the profile. It still makes an .icc-file you can find somewhere in the application data folders (I don't remember the path at the moment), but using them gives obviously incorrect colors like the main color of the ArchWiki background being much redder than it should be. I also tried following the guide Xaver/Zamundaaa wrote a little over a year ago about exactly this, but that fails to start profiling at all. Lastly I've tried profiling on Windows and copying the ICC files over and using them as-is which also gives incorrect colors, as you would expect. I would've loved to use the vendor's first party profiling software (calibrite Profiler), but they only support Windows and MacOS.

    As I understand it, ArgyllCMS (with DisplayCAL as its GUI), was typically the recommended solution for this, but they do not support Wayland and according to ArgyllCMS (see the explanation under "Display color management and Wayland" on their website) "there is little immediate prospect of ArgyllCMS being able to natively support display calibration and profiling for Wayland" due to various issues working with the Wayland devs and lacking protocols.

    Is Linux/Wayland simply not ready for this use case yet? Are there alternatives to ArgyllCMS/DisplayCAL that does support profiling on Wayland? Is it an Nvidia-related issue as it often seems to be?

    view more: next ›